Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Madhu DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioners.

Summary

Madhu Devi and Khushi Devi, wives of Shankar Sahni and Ramesh Paswan respectively, were arrested in connection with a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) case where 6.48 grams of heroin (smack) was seized from a co-accused. The petitioners claimed they had no knowledge of the drugs, were not in possession, and were falsely implicated, asserting that the only allegation against them was attempting to facilitate the co-accused's escape. They had been in judicial custody since 30 March 2026 and sought regular bail. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court found no material evidence linking the petitioners to the seized narcotics and, considering their circumstances, ordered their release on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular bail under the NDPS Act despite the allegation of facilitating the escape of a co-accused.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • NDPS Act
  • bail bond
  • criminal procedure
  • facilitation of escape
  • possession of narcotics

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30372 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2026 Thana- BUDDHACOLONY District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Madhu Devi wife of Shankar Sahni R/o- Village- China Kothi Harijan
                  Colony P.s- Buddha Colony Dist- Patna
           2.    Khushi Devi Wife of Ramesh Paswan R/o- Village- China Kothi Harijan
                 Colony P.s- Buddha Colony Dist- Patna

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a

                   case registered for the offence punishable under sections 8(c),

                   21(b) N.D.P.S. Act and sections 109, 132, 1912), 190, 125

                   B.N.S.

                                3.     The case of the prosecution, in short, is that

                   altogether 6.48 grams of smack was recovered from the

                   possession of the co-accused.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in

                   connection with the present case. It is further submitted that the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30372 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      allegation against the petitioners are that they attempted to

                      facilitate the escape of the co-accused. It is further submitted

                      that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession

                      of the petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioners are

                      lady and has criminal antecedents.               Moreover, the petitioners

                      are languishing in judicial custody since 30.03.2026.

                                   5.     Learned APP appearing for the State has

                      vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                                   6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                      of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on

                      bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on

                      bail in connection with Budha Colony P.S. Case No. 162/2026

                      on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      Session Judge/ Special Judge N.D.P.S Patna.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Jagdish/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.