Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pramod Prasad @ Pramod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioner, Pramod Prasad, a Nepalese citizen, was arrested in connection with a case alleging illegal entry into India and assisting a Bangladeshi national, under sections of the BNS, the Immigration and Foreigners Act and the Passports Act. The petitioner argued that he is innocent, has no incriminating material against him, and that the FIR does not disclose any offence against him, citing his clean antecedent and the fact that Nepalese citizens can enter India without a visa. The State contended that the petitioner is a flight risk and is aiding illegal immigration. The Court examined the vague nature of the allegations, the charge sheet, and the petitioner’s period of custody, and concluded that bail could be granted. Accordingly, the Court ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, imposing conditions including an Indian bailor, mandatory court appearances, and cancellation of bail for three consecutive absences. The order was pronounced by Justice Arun Kumar Jha.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite allegations of assisting illegal entry.
  • Whether the petitioner constitutes a flight risk under the circumstances.
  • Whether the provisions of Section 480(3) of the BNSS apply to the bail conditions.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 318(2), 3(5)
  • BNSS — s. 480(3)
  • Immigration and Foreigners Act — s. 14(1), 23, 24
  • Passports Act — s. 13, 14

Subjects

  • bail
  • immigration law
  • illegal entry
  • foreign nationals
  • flight risk
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30417 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2026 Thana- KUNAULI District- Supaul
                 ======================================================
                 Pramod Prasad @ Pramod Kumar S/O Binod Prasad Mali @ Binod Prasad
                 R/O Village- Malekpur, P.S- Pathargadha, Distt.- Saptari (Nepal).

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   11-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Kunauli P.S. Case No. 09 of 2026, registered

                   for the offences under Sections 318(2), 3(5) of the BNS, Section

                   14(1), 23, 24 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act and

                   Sections 13,14 of the Passports Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and other

                   coaccused persons were found entering India from Nepal and

                   coaccused Iti Akhtar was found carrying a Bangladeshi passport

                   and having a Visa only for Nepal.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been

                   falsely implicated in this case. The FIR does not disclose any
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30417 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026
                                            2/3




          offence against the petitioner as the petitioner is a citizen of

          Nepal and could come to India without any Visa and passport.

          Even otherwise nothing incriminating has been recovered from

          the petitioner who is having clean antecedent and he is in

          custody since 30.01.2026. Charge sheet has been submitted.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

          submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP

          submits that the petitioner is a flight risk as he is a citizen of

          Nepal and has been helping a Bangladeshi National to illegally

          enter into India.

                       6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and

          submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          vague nature of allegation against the petitioner and also

          considering submission of charge sheet and his period of

          custody, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

          Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned JMFC, Birpur/concerned court, in

          connection with Kunauli P.S. Case No. 09 of 2026, subject to

          the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and

          other following conditions:

                                  (i) One of the bailors will be an Indian
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30417 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026
                                                         3/3




                                               National.

                                               (ii) The petitioner will remain present on

                                               each and every date fixed by the court

                                               below, if so required by the learned trial

                                               court.

                                               (iii) In case of absence on three

                                               consecutive dates or in violation of the

                                               terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                                               petitioner will be liable to be cancelled

                                               by the court concerned.



                                                 (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Anuradha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.