Patna High Court
Arjun ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- RAJIV ROY
Holding
The Court rejected the petitioner's request to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition.
Summary
Arjun Chaudhary, fearing arrest in a 2013 case under sections 47(a) and F of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition in 2026. He later sought to withdraw the petition so that he could apply for bail. The State opposed, noting the FIR was over a decade old. The petitioner’s counsel argued for liberty to withdraw the petition. The Court considered whether a petition filed after such a long lapse could be withdrawn and whether the request should be granted. Justice Rajiv Roy rejected the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition, thereby keeping the petition pending.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal miscellaneous petition filed after a long lapse can be withdrawn at the petitioner's request
- Whether the court should permit withdrawal to enable the petitioner to seek bail
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 — s. 47(a), F
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- petition for withdrawal
- bail
- statute of limitations
- prohibition act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30469 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2013 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP.
District- Nawada
======================================================
Arjun Chaudhary Son of Bhoju Chaudhary Resident of village- Jarhia, P.S-
Sitamarhi, Dist- Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2 13-05-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in
connection with G.O Case no. 31 of 2013 for the offence
registered under sections 47(a) and F Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act, 2016.
3. At the outset, learned APP, Mr. Jitendra Kumar
Singh submits that the FIR is of the year 2013 and the
petitioner has moved before this Court in the year 2026.
4. After some argument, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the
petition to take appropriate steps for seeking bail.
5. Granting said liberty, Cr. Misc. No. 30469 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30469 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
2/2
2026 is rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay
Singh/Sanny Patel
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.