Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Subhash Kumar Choudhary @ Subhash ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, holding that ownership of the house alone does not warrant denial of bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar Choudhary, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after police raided his Purnia house and recovered 1.350 litres of illicit liquor, arresting five occupants. The petitioner argued that he merely owned the house, which he had let out to students on rent, and that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution relied on the FIR alleging possession of illicit liquor at the premises. The court examined the petitioner's claim of non‑involvement and the minimal quantity of liquor recovered, and considered that the occupants, not the owner, were arrested. Finding no sufficient ground to deny bail, the court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC, subject to conditions. The application for anticipatory bail was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the owner of a premises can be held liable for offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act when illicit liquor is found on the premises.
  • Whether anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC is appropriate in the present facts.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • illegal liquor
  • ownership of premises
  • false implication

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30526 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2025 Thana- Sahayak Khajanchi District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Subhash Kumar Choudhary @ Subhash Choudhary son of Late Sudeshwar
                 Prasad Choudhary Resident of Shivpuri PS- Sahayak Khajanchi, Dist- Purnia
                 Presently Residing At A-402 NTPC Apartemtn Phase I Ashiana nagar Ps-
                 Rajiv nagar, Po- Ashiana nagar, patna

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr. Pankaj
                                                    Mr. Kaushal Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Akbar Ali
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-05-2026         1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned

                            Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                       2.   This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out

                            of Sahayak Khajanchi Police Station Case No. 341 of

                            2025, dated 07.10.2025, disclosing offences under

                            Sections 30(a), 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                            Act.

                       3. The prosecution story, as per the First Information Report,

                            is that the police, on the basis of secret information that

                            some persons were having a party along with liquor in the

                            house of the petitioner situated at Purnia, raided the house

                            and recovered 1.350 litres of illicit liquor and empty
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30526 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                            2/3




                  bottles of liquor and arrested five persons aged between

                  25 to 27 years. The petitioner has been made accused on

                  the basis of the fact that he happens to be the owner of the

                  house, in question.

              4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                  petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case

                  only because he happens to be the owner of the house,

                  which was let out by the petitioner in favour of the co-

                  accused persons on monthly rent. He next submits that the

                  petitioner is an engineer and has retired from NTPC,

                  Barh, and has been residing permanently at Patna in the

                  NTPC Phase-I, Ashina Nagar Apartments. He further

                  submits that the students, who were residing in the house,

                  in question, of the petitioner at Purnia, have been granted

                  regular bail by the court below itself.

              5. Regards being had to the submissions made on behalf of

                  the parties and taking into consideration the defence of

                  the petitioner that the house was let out to the students on

                  monthly rent and only empty bottles of liquor along with

                  a small quantity of liquor were recovered and the persons

                  residing in the house were arrested, I am inclined to grant

                  the petitioner the privilege of anticipatory bail.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30526 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                                        3/3




                          6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

                          7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest

                              or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be

                              released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                              (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount

                              each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

                              Excise Court 1, Purnia, in connection with Sahayak

                              Khajanchi Police Station Case No. 341 of 2025, subject to

                              the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code

                              of Criminal Procedure.



                                               (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
ashwani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.