Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalan Kumar @ Lalan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Petitioners Chhotu Kumar and Lalan Kumar were arrested in connection with a robbery allegedly committed on 20-11-2025, for which they were charged under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s case is based mainly on a self‑confessional statement by Chhotu Kumar and the recovery of some stolen articles from his house, with no other material evidence or a thorough investigation (TIP) presented. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated, that the FIR named unknown persons, and that there is insufficient evidence to justify continued detention. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, but the court considered the lack of corroborative evidence and the petitioners’ custody since early December 2025. The court granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence or witnesses, and verification of criminal antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in offences punishable under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 given the facts of the case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • robbery
  • deadly weapons
  • self‑confession
  • Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita
  • criminal antecedent
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30573 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-875 Year-2025 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Chhotu Kumar @ Chotu Kumar S/o Indradev Paswan R/o Village / Town -
                 Asadharpur, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                                         with
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30635 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-875 Year-2025 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Lalan Kumar @ Lalan Paswan S/O Chandeshwar Paswan Resident of village-
                 Bedauliya, P.s.- Kazipur, District- Vaishali

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30573 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Aniket Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30635 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sangeeta Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioners seeks bail in connection with Hajipur

                   Sadar P.S. Case No. 875 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 21.11.2025 for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 309(4) and 317(2) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 30573 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/4




                      3. According to the prosecution case, the informant

          alleged that on 20.11.2025, two unknown miscreants entered her

          house and looted ornaments and other valuable articles by

          brandishing deadly weapons at the informant.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in

          the present case. It appears from the FIR that FIR is instituted

          against unknown persons and implication of the petitioners is

          based on alleged self-confessional statement of the petitioner,

          namely, Chhotu Kumar @ Chotu Kumar and thereafter the said

          Chhotu Kumar had confessed his guilt in the present occurrence

          and stated that another petitioner, namely, Lalan Kumar @

          Lalan Paswan also accompanied him in the alleged occurrence

          and except the aforesaid, no other cogent material has come

          during investigation which suggest the involvement of the

          petitioner in the present occurrence. He next submits that

          although some articles have been recovered from the house of

          the petitioner, namely, Chhotu Kumar but till date no TIP has

          been conducted by the prosecution. The police after

          investigation submitted charge-sheet against the petititoners and

          the petitioner, namely, Chhotu Kumar @ Chotu Kumar is in

          custody since 02.12.2025 and another petitioner, namely, Lalan
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 30573 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                            3/4




          Kumar @ Lalan Paswan in custody since 01.12.2025.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          Additional District and Sessions Judge-VIII, Vaishali, Hajipur in

          connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 875 of 2025,

          subject to the following conditions:-

                       i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       ii. If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

          move for cancellation of bail.

                       iii. And further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at

          any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their

          criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 30573 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                        4/4




                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.