Patna High Court
Shankar KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioners subject to a bond and specified conditions.
Summary
Shankar Kumar and Pappu Rai were arrested on 18 March 2026 for alleged possession of 84.48 litres of illicit foreign liquor in a tempo, charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The petitioners contended they had no conscious possession, possessed clean antecedents, and argued that the seizure was not conducted in compliance with Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023 because the seizure list witnesses were police officers. The State opposed bail. The High Court considered the factual matrix, the alleged procedural lapses, and the petitioners' clean record, and ordered that bail be granted on a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents. The bail order was made without delay for verification. The court also empowered the trial court to cancel bail on breach of conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail despite the nature of the offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
- Whether the seizure of the liquor complied with the mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023.
- Whether the petitioners' clean antecedent and lack of conscious possession justify the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 — s. 30(a), 32(3)
- BNSS, 2023 — s. 103, 105
Subjects
- bail
- excise
- illicit liquor
- seizure procedure
- procedural compliance
- criminal antecedent
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- BNSS
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30666 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2026 Thana- EXCISE DANAPUR District- Patna
======================================================
1. Shankar Kumar S/o Shatrudhan Rai Resident of village - Brahmchari, P.S -
Danapur, District - Patna
2. Pappu Rai S/o Dinesh Rai Resident of village - Brahmchari, P.S - Danapur,
District - Patna
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioners seek bail who are in custody since
18.03.2026 in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 320 of
2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32(3)
of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
3. The prosecution case in brief, is that, allegations as
per the written complaint dated 17.03.2026 of the informant,
who is S.I. of Danapur Police Station are that on 17.03.2026 at
04:45 am, the police chased and caught a tempo bearing
Registration No. BR01PL-1897, two persons were also caught
by the police from the tempo, who told their name as Shankar
Kumar, who was driving the tempo and Pappu Rai, who was
passenger in the tempo. On search altogether 84.48 litres of
illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the back side of the
seat of the said tempo.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30666 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
petitioners have clean antecedent and are innocent and they
have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned
counsel for the petitioners submits that from perusal of the
seizure list it appears that nothing has been recovered from the
conscious possession of the petitioners rather the recovery has
been made from the tempo in question and recovery is of 84.48
litres of illicit foreign liquor from the back side of the seat of the
tempo. It is next submitted that from perusal of the seizure list it
appears that the seizure list witnesses are police personnel so
there is non-compliance of mandatory provisions of Sections
103 and 105 of BNSS, 2023 and petitioner is in custody since
18.03.2026.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has
vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned Court of Special Excise Judge, Danapur in connection
with Danapur P.S. Case No. 320 of 2026, subject to the
following conditions:-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30666 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
3/3
i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.