Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court denied bail, holding that the seriousness of the offences and the evidence on record do not warrant the grant of regular bail.

Summary

Rupesh Kumar was arrested on 9 October 2024 in connection with a loot and murder case registered as Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2024. The FIR originally alleged offences under Sections 279 and 304‑A of the IPC, later amended to include Sections 302, 201, 120‑B, 379 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner applied for regular bail for the first time, which was rejected on 1 September 2025. He made a second bail application on 19 June 2026, arguing that only one of ten witnesses had been examined. The court, considering the gravity of the charges and the material connecting the petitioner to the crime, declined to revisit its earlier order and dismissed the bail application. Consequently, the petitioner remains in custody.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused in a case involving murder, loot, and possession of arms under the cited provisions of the IPC and Arms Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • loot
  • IPC
  • Arms Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30686 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2024 Thana- BHAWANIPUR District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Rupesh Kumar S/o Sukhlal Mahato R/o- Haraili Sonvarsha, Ward No. 1, P.S. -
                 Uda Kishunganj, Distt. - Madhepura.

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :          Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate
                                                     Mr. Saroj Kumar Choudhary
                 For the Opposite Party/s :          Mr. Raj Kishor Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-06-2026                   Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner

                   and the learned APP for the State.

                                 2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner seeking bail

                   in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2024

                   registered for the offence under Sections 279, 304-A of the IPC

                   and later on Sections 302, 201, 120-B and 379 of the Indian

                   Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act was added.

                                 3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was

                   rejected on 01.09.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 26842 of 2025 which

                   reads as follows:-

                                                           Heard learned counsel for the parties.
                                                           2. This application for grant of regular bail
                                              arises out of Bhawanipur P.S. Case No.97 of 2024
                                              registered for the offence punishable under sections 279
                                              and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code but, later on,
                                              sections 302, 201, 120-B and 379 of the Indian Penal
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30686 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                                              Code and under section 27 of the Arms Act were also
                                              added in the F.I.R.
                                                            3. It is alleged that the petitioner has
                                              participated in the loot and murder of the deceased. He
                                              is in custody since 09.10.2024.
                                                            4. During the investigation, materials have
                                              come to connect the petitioner with the crime in a
                                              planned manner.
                                                            5. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not
                                              inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of regular bail.
                                              Accordingly, this bail application is rejected.



                                   4. Mr. Agrawal, the learned Senior Counsel for the

                      petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since

                      09.10.2024 and in the trial out of ten witnesses, only one

                      witness has been examined; therefore, the petitioner may be

                      granted bail.

                                   5. Considering the nature of the accusation and the

                      gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to review my earlier

                      order. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands

                      dismissed.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.