Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Haradhan SahaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that, given the petitioner’s clean record and the non‑specific nature of the allegations, bail should be granted.

Summary

Haradhan Saha was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bihar National Security Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly abusing an informant and assaulting another person with the butt of a pistol. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and that the allegations were vague and did not specifically charge him with firing a weapon. The State opposed bail, relying on the prosecution’s version of events. After hearing both sides, the court noted the petitioner’s lack of prior record and the general nature of the accusations, and decided to grant bail. The court ordered the petitioner to be released on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑I, Katihar.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious charges under the Bihar National Security Act and the Arms Act
  • Whether the nature of the allegations justifies continued judicial custody

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Arms Act
  • Bihar National Security Act
  • false implication

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30811 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2026 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Haradhan Saha Son of Chumu Sahu @ Chamu Saha Resident of Village-
                 Maharani Rounia, P.S.- Barari, District- Katihar (but in the impugned order it
                 has wrongly been typed as Residents of Village- Maheshlitti, P.S.- Kadma,
                 District- Godda (Jharkhand) which is clear from FIR itself)

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Barari P.S. Case No. 61 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S.,

                   2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioner along with other has abused the informant and one

                   Vibhash Kumar Saha has assaulted with the butt of the country

                   made pistol on the head of the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30811 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     case. He also submits that there is also a counter version of this

                     case. The nature of allegation is general and omnibus. He

                     further submits that there is no allegation of firing against this

                     petitioner. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the

                     petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is

                     languishing in judicial custody since 07.03.2026.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Katihar in connection

                     with Barari P.S. Case No. 61 of 2026.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.