Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prince Kumar Pandey @ Prince Pandey @ BabaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Prince Kumar Pandey was arrested in connection with a case registered under the NDPS Act, Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Arms Act, where a loaded pistol, two cartridges and 1.5 kg of ganja were seized. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging that the seizure was not conducted in accordance with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. and that no contraband was found on his person, and that the quantity seized was far below commercial levels. He had been in judicial custody since 20 November 2025 and sought regular bail. The State opposed the bail, but the court, after hearing both sides, found merit in the petitioner's arguments and ordered his release on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The order was pronounced by Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey of the Patna High Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted in offences under the NDPS Act, B.N.S.S., and Arms Act where the seizure procedure is alleged to be non‑compliant with Section 105.
  • Whether the quantity of seized narcotics, being less than commercial quantity, warrants the grant of bail.
  • Whether the duration of pre‑trial detention justifies the release of the petitioner on bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • B.N.S.S.
  • Arms Act
  • seizure procedure
  • quantity of contraband
  • regular bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30850 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-561 Year-2025 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Prince Kumar Pandey @ Prince Pandey @ Baba S/O Sawaliya Pandey R/O
                 Vill.- Saray Parawali, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Siwan
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 8, 20(b)(II)

                   (B) of the N.D.P.S. Act, Sections 310(4), 310(5) and 111 of BNS

                   and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that from the

                   possession of this petitioner one loaded country made pistol along

                   with two live cartridges was recovered. It is further alleged that

                   from that place, 1.5 kg of ganja was also recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has

                   falsely been implicated in this case. As per seizure list, the ganja

                   was recovered from a bag. Learned counsel for the petitioner has

                   submitted that while making seizure, Section 105 of B.N.S.S. has
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30850 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      not been complied and the seizure list witnesses are police

                      personnel. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of

                      this petitioner. It has also been submitted that though the ganja

                      was recovered from the possession of the petitioner then also, the

                      quantum of the contraband which has been recovered from the

                      possession of this petitioner is though more than small quantity

                      but is much less than commercial quantity. Moreover, the

                      petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 20.11.2025.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

                      opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 561 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond

                      of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-

                      cum-Special Judge, Siwan.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-
U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.