Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suraj Kumar @ Nandlal Kumar @ Nandlal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a), 37, 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act after police seized 736.200 litres of illicit foreign liquor. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of a group transporting the liquor, while the petitioner contended that nothing was recovered from his possession and that he was merely a passer‑by, his involvement based only on a confessional statement. He had been in judicial custody since 12 March 2026 and applied for bail. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides, the High Court considered the facts, the nature of the offence and the lack of direct possession by the petitioner. The Court granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act for alleged transport of illicit liquor.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement, based solely on a confessional statement and absence of seized possession, warrants denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition act
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • criminal procedure
  • confessional statement

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30877 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2026 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Suraj Kumar @ Nandlal Kumar @ Nandlal Yadav Son of Late Jaylal Ray @
                 Jaylal Prasad R/O Village- Ganj Gaurihar (Wrongly mentioned as Ganj
                 Bazar), P.S.- Sakra (Now Bariyarpur), District- Muzaffarpur
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Karja P.S. Case No.71 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 30(a), 37, 41 and 47 of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise(Amendment) Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police

                   had secret information that huge amount of liquor was being

                   transported and unloaded. The police reached at the place of

                   occurrence and four persons were apprehended; rest managed to

                   flee away. The petitioner is one among them. When the vehicles

                   were searched, there was huge amount of illicit liquor.

                   Altogether 736.200 litre of illicit foreign liquor was recovered.

                   On being asked the petitioner disclosed that illicit liquor was

                   being transported at their instance.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30877 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                      petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from

                      the possession of the petitioner. It has further been submitted

                      that the petitioner has been framed in this case on the basis of

                      his confessional statement. It has further been submitted that the

                      petitioner is merely a passer-by and he has nothing to do with

                      the illicit recovery of the liquor. It has lastly been submitted that

                      the petitioner is in judicial custody since 12.03.2026.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                      for the State.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                      bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                      of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned

                      Exclusive Special Excise court-II, Muzaffarpur in connection

                      with Karja P.S. Case No.71 of 2026.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.