Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoj DasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court ordered anticipatory bail for the petitioners, subject to surrender and bail bond conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

Manoj Das and Saudagar Das applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 344 of 2025, which alleges assault on Prakash Das under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution claims the petitioners assaulted the victim with a farsa and an iron rod, while the petitioners contend they are innocent, the injury is not grievous, the offence is bailable, and the complaint was filed six days after the incident. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the Court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to surrender within four weeks and to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The order emphasizes the court's discretion to prevent unwarranted arrest while ensuring compliance with bail conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
  • Whether the offences alleged are bailable in nature
  • Whether the circumstances justify the court's intervention under Section 482(2) to prevent arrest

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • assault
  • bailable offence
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions
  • preventive detention

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3139 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2025 Thana- BANKA District- Banka
                 ======================================================
           1.     Manoj Das S/o Aghan Das R/o Village - Ambha, P.S - Banka, District -
                  Banka
           2.    Saudagar Das @ Sadanand Das @ Sadanand Kumar Das S/o Manoj Das R/o
                 Village - Ambha, P.S - Banka, District - Banka

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   10-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP

                   for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

                                 2. The instant application for anticipatory bail have

                   been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in

                   connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 344 of 2025 instituted for the

                   offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 109,

                   308(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that Saudagar

                   Das has assaulted Prakash Das on the head with a farsa, whereas

                   Manoj Das has assaulted Prakash Das on the head with an iron

                   rod.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3139 of 2026(3) dt.10-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this

                    case. He also submits that there is also a counter version of this

                    case. He also submits that there is no repetition of the blow and the

                    injury, which is found to be grievous, is on the arm, which is

                    bailable in nature. He further submits that the case was filed after

                    six days of the occurrence.

                                 5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State and

                    learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of bail

                    of the petitioners.

                                 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in

                    the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court

                    is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are

                    directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four

                    weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in

                    connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 344 of 2025, they will be

                    enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

                    ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                    satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka subject to

                    the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya

                    Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.


                                                   (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.