Patna High Court
Murari @ Krishna Singh @ Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions.
Summary
Murari Singh was arrested on 24 March 2026 in connection with a seizure of 99.90 litres of illegal liquor from his borewell, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The prosecution claimed the liquor was stored by Singh and an associate, and that the seizure was conducted following a secret tip, with police personnel acting as witnesses. The petitioner argued that the seizure list violated mandatory provisions of Sections 103 and 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act, 2023, and that he had no direct involvement in the liquor. The State opposed bail, citing a prior case, though the petitioner was already on bail in that matter. The Court, after considering the facts, granted bail on a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, presence in court, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents. The bail order was made without delay for verification purposes.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail for an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.
- Whether the seizure and witness procedures complied with Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS Act, 2023.
- Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent affects the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNSS) Act, 2023 — s. 103, 105
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- bail
- illegal liquor
- excise law
- seizure
- witness compliance
- criminal antecedent
- BNSS Act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31400 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2026 Thana- SIKRAUL District- Buxar
======================================================
Murari @ Krishna Singh @ Krishna Kumar S/O Sudheshwar Singh Resident
of village- Parmeshwarpur, P.S.- Sikraul, Dist.- Buxar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 08-05-2026 Heard Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma, learned counsel
for the petitioner and Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned Additional
Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
24.03.2026 in connection with Sikraul P.S. Case No. 38 of 2026
for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on
16.03.2026 the informant received a secret information at 11.30
o' clock that a village of Parmeshwarpur field in tubal of Murari
Singh put in heavy quantity illegal liquor by the Murari Singh
and Piush Kumar. As per information that the information given
higher authorities and for verification of that information they
are reached on that place of occurrence at about 12:00 o' clock
and put on raid on that boring. On that action saw several
persons reached there but no one person ready for made as
independent witness then on appearance of police personnel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31400 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
2/3
made as witness and search the said boring and total recovered
about 99.90 liters of liquor. That after a seizure list prepared and
the said FIR was lodged against two accused persons including
this petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it
appears from the FIR and seizure list that altogether 99.90 liters
of liquor was recovered from the boring of the petitioner. It is
next submitted that the petitioner has no concern at all with the
alleged recovery of liquor and from perusal of the seizure list it
appears that the seizure list witnesses are police personnel so
there is non-compliance of mandatory provisions of Sections
103 and 105 of BNSS, 2023 and petitioner is in custody since
24.03.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State
has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and
submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case other than the
present case but fairly submits that petitioner is on bail in the
pending matter.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31400 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
3/3
Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No. 2, Buxar in
connection with Sikraul P.S. Case No. 38 of 2026, subject to the
following conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.