Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Suraj Kumar Yadav @ Suraj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioners, Suraj Kumar Yadav and Roushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Ara Nawada PS Case No. 174 of 2026) involving the death of a man's son after an alleged shooting. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 103(1), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, but did not specifically name the petitioners. The petitioners argued they were innocent, had no criminal antecedent, and were falsely implicated. The State opposed the bail. The Court, noting the lack of specific allegation and the petitioners' clean record, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, cooperation with investigation, and verification of antecedents under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the FIR specifically implicates the petitioners in the alleged offences.
  • Whether the petitioners' clean antecedent warrants the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • clean antecedent
  • FIR
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31469 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2026 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Suraj Kumar Yadav @ Suraj Yadav Son of Surendra Yadav Resident of
                  village - Maulabagh, Police Station - Ara Nawada, District - Bhojpur.
           2.    Roushan Kumar @ Raushan Yadav Son of Surendra Yadav Resident of
                 village - Maulabagh, Police Station - Ara Nawada, District - Bhojpur.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 174 of 2026, registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 351(3), 352, 3(5) of

                   the B.N.S.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, as per the

                   informant is that she is living on rent in the house of Ashok

                   Singh with her son. There was an altercation between the

                   accused persons including the petitioners and the son of the

                   informant in the past. On 28.02.2026, while the informant along

                   with her son was going to Pakri Chauk, Navneet Yadav and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31469 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                            2/3




          Manjit Yadav came and fired upon her son which hit on chest.

          The miscreants fled away. During treatment, the son of the

          informant died.

                        4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence. He

          further submits that they have falsely been implicated in the

          present case. No overt act has been attributed to the petitioners

          in this incident in which the son of the informant died. The

          petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

                        5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of

          anticipatory bail.

                        6. From the reading of the FIR, it transpires that there

          is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Both the

          petitioners have clean antecedent. Under these circumstances,

          this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the

          petitioner.

                        7. Let the petitioners, named above, in the event of

          their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four

          weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial

          Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Nawada P.S.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31469 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                                          3/3




                        Case No. 174 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under

                        section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

                        and subject to the further condition that:-

                                     (i)    the     petitioner      shall    co-operate   in   the

                        investigation/trial.

                                     (ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the

                        criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case it is found that

                        the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court

                        below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                        petitioner. However, it is expected that the verification process

                        would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.



                                                  (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.