Patna High Court
Pawan Kumar @ Pawan PrasadversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail, subject to specified conditions.
Summary
Petitioner Pawan Kumar was arrested on 1 March 2026 for alleged possession of 300 litres of illicit country-made liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. The prosecution alleged that the police, acting on secret information, seized the liquor from the petitioner’s conscious possession during a raid. The petitioner, claiming a clean antecedent and that the case was based on suspicion, sought bail, noting that co‑accused had already been released on bail. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail. The High Court, after considering the facts and the bail granted to co‑accused, ordered the petitioner’s release on bail of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, presence in court, and non‑tampering with evidence or concealment of antecedents.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail for an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.
- Whether the circumstances of seizure and alleged possession justify denial of bail.
- Whether the grant of bail to co‑accused influences the petitioner’s bail application.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- bail
- illicit liquor
- prohibition law
- seizure
- criminal antecedent
- Bihar
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31505 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2026 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran
======================================================
Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Prasad S/o Late Chunchun Prasad R/O Village-
Daulatganj, P.S- Bhagwan Bazar, Dist.-Saran
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Suman Kumari Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 07-05-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel
for the petitioner and Ms. Suman Kumari Singh, learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
01.03.2026 in connection with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 127 of
2026 for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief is that that the
police received a secret information that some persons were
selling illicit country made liquor in Diara area at village Diliya
Rahimpur, acting upon that information police reached on the
spot. In the meantime, six Persons were started to flee away
from there upon seeing the police party. After chase, three
persons were apprehended on the spot and three persons were
succeeded to flee away from the spot. Upon searching the said
place, Police recovered 300 litres country made liquor from the
conscious possession of petitioner which was duly seized.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31505 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
2/3
Thereafter, police seized the illicit liquor and prepared seizure-
list in presence of two witnesses from the raiding party.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has clean antecedent and the petitioner has been made
an accused in the present case on the basis of suspicion. Learned
counsel for the petitioner next submits that it appears from the
FIR and seizure list that nothing has been recovered from
village Diliya Rahimpur, Diara area. Learned counsel for the
petitioner next submits that co-accused person, namely, Niraj
Kumar Sah has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this
Court vide order dated 15.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.
24242 of 2026 and another co-accused person, namely, Deepak
Kumar has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this
Court vide order dated 16.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.
25459 of 2026 and petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State
has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2 nd
Exclusive Special Excise Judge, Saran at Chapra in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31505 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
3/3
with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 127 of 2026, subject to the
following conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.