Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pulkit SadaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court denied bail, holding that the large quantity of ganja and the absence of an age-related ground justify dismissal of the bail application.

Summary

The petitioner, Pulkit Sada, applied for regular bail in an NDPS case where 127 kilograms of ganja were seized near the Koshi River and he allegedly fled the scene. He has been in custody since December 20, 2025 and claims innocence, citing that a co‑accused of similar involvement was granted bail. The State opposed, arguing that prima facie material links the petitioner to the offence and that the massive quantity seized exceeds commercial limits. The court noted that the co‑accused received bail due to advanced age (68 years), a factor not applicable to the petitioner, who is 48. Consequently, the court dismissed the bail application, emphasizing that its observations are preliminary and will not affect the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused in an NDPS case involving a large quantity of narcotics.
  • Whether the age of the accused is a relevant factor for bail in this context.
  • Whether the presence of prima facie material is sufficient to deny bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • large quantity of narcotics
  • age factor
  • prima facie evidence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31587 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2025 Thana- RATANPUR District- Supaul
                 ======================================================
                 Pulkit Sada S/O Late Satain Sada R/O Vill.- Piprahi, Piprahipatti, Ward No. 1,
                 P.s.- Ratanpur, District- Sapaul

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   14-05-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   N.D.P.S. Case No.86 of 2025, arising out of Ratanpura P.S. Case

                   No.65 of 2025 registered for the offence under sections 8/20(B)

                   (ii)(C)/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. It is alleged that 127 kilograms of ganja was

                   recovered from a bush situated near the bank of the Koshi River

                   and the petitioner allegedly fled away from the place of

                   occurrence.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.

                   Petitioner is in custody since 20.12.2025. It is further submitted

                   that similarly situated co-accused person namely Sahdeo Ray @

                   Kialu Ray @ Sahdev Rai @ Keelu Rai has been granted bail by
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31587 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      this Court on 26.03.2026 in Cr. Misc. No. 6233 of 2026.

                                   5. Per contra, learned counsel for the State

                      vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there

                      exists prima facie material against the petitioner indicating his

                      involvement in the commission of the offence.

                                   6. Considering the huge recovery of ganja, which is

                      much more than the commercial quantity, this Court is not

                      inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

                                   7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands

                      dismissed. It is made clear that the similarly situated co-accused

                      namely, Sahdeo Ray @ Kialu Ray @ Sahdev Rai @ Keelu Rai,

                      was granted bail only because he was aged about 68 years and

                      this ground is not applicable in the case of the petitioner, who is

                      only 48 years old.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.


                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.