Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mahesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Mahesh Kumar was arrested after police seized 90 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a bike he was driving, charging him under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was unaware of the liquor, that the seizure was illegal because the police did not comply with Section 105 of the BNSS, and that he had no prior criminal record, having been in judicial custody since 26‑03‑2026. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the facts, the alleged procedural lapse in seizure, and the petitioner’s lack of antecedents, and decided to grant bail. The bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, to be approved by the Exclusive Special Judge, Excise, Madhubani.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the charges of illicit liquor possession and related offences.
  • Whether the seizure of the liquor was lawful given the alleged non‑compliance with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of knowledge of the contraband and clean criminal record justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise law
  • seizure
  • Section 105
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31639 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2026 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Mahesh Kumar S/o Soukhi Yadav Resident of Village- Chharapatti, ward No.
                 04, P.S.- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   14-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 140 of 2026 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 274, 275, 317(5) of the

                   B.N.S., 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from an

                   Apache bike, which was being driven by the petitioner,

                   altogether 90 liters of country-made illicit liquor was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. He also submits that the petitioners were unaware of the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31639 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     consignment kept in the said bike. He further submits that

                     nothing has been recovered from the possession of the

                     petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel

                     and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS

                     while making the seizure. Moreover, a statement has been made

                     in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal

                     antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since

                     26.03.2026.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Exclusive Special Judge, Excise, Madhubani in connection with

                     Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 140 of 2026.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.