Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan Mandal @ Pawan Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner with a bond and conditions, holding that the circumstances did not preclude release.

Summary

The petitioner, Pawan Mandal, was arrested for alleged possession of 1,311.84 litres of illicit foreign and Nepali liquor seized from a semi‑constructed house that he owned. He contended that the house was an open space, the liquor was not in his possession, and the police had not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. The State opposed bail, citing two prior similar convictions. After hearing both sides, the Court held that bail could be granted provided the petitioner pledged not to engage in similar offences. Accordingly, the petitioner was released on bail upon furnishing a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to the condition of not committing similar offences in the future.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the seizure of the liquor was lawful given the alleged non‑compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior convictions justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • illegal liquor
  • seizure
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 105
  • prior convictions
  • excise law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31711 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2026 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Pawan Mandal @ Pawan Kumar Mandal S/o Masudi Mandal @ Lt. Masaudi
                 Mandal @ Lt. Masodi Mandal R/o- Village- Kalapatti, P.S.- Phulparas,
                 District- Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ramchandra Jha Raman, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   14-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a

                   semi-constructed house of the petitioner, altogether 1311.84 liters

                   of illicit foreign and Nepali liquor were recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also

                   submits that though the semi-constructed house belongs to the

                   petitioner, but it is an open place which has no evidentiary value

                   in the eye of law. He also submits that nothing has been recovered
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31711 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     from the possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure

                     list are police personnel and the police has not complied with

                     Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. Moreover, the

                     petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.03.2026.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner has got two criminal

                     antecedent of similar nature.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that

                     the petitioner shall not indulge himself in similar nature of

                     offences in future. The above named petitioner is directed to be

                     enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten

                     thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise,

                     Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case

                     No. 81 of 2026.


                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.