Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhinav MaisiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhinav Maisi, was arrested in connection with a case alleging creation of a fake account and Facebook ID used to cheat victims, charged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Information Technology Act. He contended that he was innocent, that the SIM card in his name was handed over to a co‑accused Altaf who misused it, and that the Facebook ID mentioned in the FIR did not belong to him. The State opposed his bail application. The court, after hearing both sides, found that the allegations did not directly implicate the petitioner in cheating and noted his lack of prior criminal record. Consequently, the court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail pending trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite charges under B.N.S. and the IT Act
  • Whether mere possession of a SIM card and alleged association with a fake account constitute sufficient grounds to deny bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • cyber crime
  • fake account
  • Information Technology Act
  • B.N.S.
  • sections 66
  • sections 66D
  • sections 67
  • bail application

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31729 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Abhinav Maisi Son of Sandeep Maisi @ Sandeep Resident of Family Line,
                 Kacchi Scheme, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Alwar (Rajsthan)


                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr. Anshul Aaryan, Advocate
                                                    Mr. Aditya Raj Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Nand Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(2),

                   318(4), 319(2), 356(2), 356(4) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66,

                   66D and 67 of the I.T. Act. Later on Section 317(5) of B.N.S.

                   was added.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that a fake

                   account in the name of S.P., East Champaran, Motihari was

                   created and a fake facebook I.D. was also created and with the

                   aid of fake account and facebook I.D., innocent persons were

                   being cheated. A mobile number and facebook I.D. are also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31729 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                            2/3




          there in the F.I.R.

                       4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

          committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

          case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

          mobile no. xxxxxxxxxx though is in his name but he has given

          the said sim to one Altaf from whose possession, the sim was

          recovered. It has further been submitted that only fault on the

          part of this petitioner is that he has given his sim to co-accused

          who has misused it. It has further been submitted that there is no

          any direct allegation against the petitioner of cheating anybody.

          It has further been submitted that the facebook I.D. which is

          there in the F.I.R. does not belong to the petitioner. He is having

          no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody

          since 07.07.2025.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

          vehemently opposed the application for bail.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

          petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31729 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                                         3/3




                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                       A.C.J.M.-IV, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with

                       Motihari P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025.


                                                   (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.