Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Verma Kumar Yadav @ Barma Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Verma Kumar Yadav and Ritesh Kumar Yadav, were arrested in connection with Excise Siwan (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 170 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that they were innocent, had no ownership or control over the seized liquor or the vehicle, and were merely present near the check‑post when police seized the contraband. Their counsel argued that no material evidence linked them to the offence and that the seizure was made only in the presence of police without independent witnesses. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the lack of incriminating material, the petitioners' clean antecedents, and the length of custody, the Court granted regular bail, directing each petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioners under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act given the facts of the case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • false implication
  • excise offence
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31895 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
           1.     Verma Kumar Yadav @ Barma Kumar Yadav, S/o Mahanth Yadav @
                  Mahesh Yadav, Resident of village- Masudaha, P.S.- Ander, District- Siwan,
                  Bihar
           2.    Ritesh Kumar Yadav, S/o- Keshav Yadav @ Keshab Yadav @ Kesho Yadav,
                 Resident of village- Masudaha, P.S.- Ander, District- Siwan, Bihar

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Advocate
                 For the State             :        Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-05-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                  2. Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with

                   Excise Siwan (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 170 of 2026 registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. It is submitted that the petitioners are neither

                   owners of the alleged seized liquor nor of the vehicle in

                   question. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners

                   are local residents and had reached near the check-post after

                   hearing noise and commotion and have been falsely implicated
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31895 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      merely due to their presence near the place of occurrence. It is

                      also submitted that no material has been brought on record

                      connecting the petitioners with the ownership, control or use of

                      the vehicle. Learned counsel further submits that the alleged

                      seizure was made only in presence of police personnel and no

                      independent witness supported the prosecution case. It is lastly

                      submitted that the petitioners have clean antecedent and are in

                      custody since 02.03.2026.

                                   4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

                      for bail of the petitioners.

                                   5. In the facts and circumstances of this case, and

                      considering the statements made in the petition as well as the

                      above submissions and period of custody, this Court is inclined

                      to grant the relief of bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, let the

                      petitioners named-above be released on bail on furnishing bail

                      bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                      concerned Court in connection with Excise Siwan (Sadar) P.S.

                      Case No. 170 of 2026.


                                                (Shailendra Singh, J)

maynaz/krishna/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.