Patna High Court
Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The bail granted to the accused is not cancelled.
Summary
The petitioner, Kamlesh Yadav, filed an application seeking cancellation of the bail granted to respondents Arjun Yadav and Ram Lal Yadav in a criminal miscellaneous case. The bail had been ordered by the Patna High Court on 6 March 2025 for offences alleged under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act, including charges of murder with firearms. The respondents argued that there was no suppression of material facts at the time of the bail hearing. The court examined the submissions and the record of prior orders and found no basis to set aside the bail. Consequently, the application for cancellation of bail was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the bail granted to the accused under sections of the B.N.S. and the Arms Act should be cancelled
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- cancellation of bail
- criminal procedure
- Arms Act
- B.N.S.
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31900 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2024 Thana- MAIGRA District- Gaya
======================================================
Kamlesh Yadav S/o- Chandrika Yadav Village- Harni Tarwadih Ps- Maigra
Dist-Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Arjun Yadav S/o- Dhanushdhari Yadav Village- Harni Tarwadih Ps- Maigra
Dist-Gaya
3. Ram Lal Yadav S/o- Doman Yadav Village- Harni Tarwadih Ps- Maigra
Dist-Gaya
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
6 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present application has been filed for
cancellation of bail who has been granted bail to the opposite
parties no. 2 and 3 by this Court vide order dated 06.03.2025
passed in Cr. Misc. No. 9976 of 2025, disclosing their offences
under sections 103, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 3(5) of
the B.N.S. and section 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 and 3
has taken this Court through various orders from which it
appears that there has been no suppression by the opposite
parties no. 2 and 3 at the time of argument as it was argued by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31900 of 2025(6) dt.25-02-2026
2/2
the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 that the opposite parties were
accused of killing the decease with firearms.
4. In view thereof, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Ranjeet/-
U T
Checking your session…