Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Akhilesh Raut @ Akalesh Raut @ Akalesh RawatversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner deserves bail and ordered his release on regular bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Akhilesh Raut, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no liquor or incriminating article was found in his possession, and that the alleged seizure was made from a public area far from his residence without a proper seizure list or independent witnesses. The petitioner had been in custody since 12 April 2026 and had only one prior criminal antecedent. The State opposed the bail application. After considering the submissions, the Court found that the petitioner merited relief and ordered his release on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Whether the alleged seizure of liquor was conducted in accordance with law and thus justifies denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • false implication
  • seizure
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31933 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2026 Thana- SAHAJITPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Akhilesh Raut @ Akalesh Raut @ Akalesh Rawat, S/o Chhathi Lal Rawat,
                 R/o Village- Bangali Patti, P.S.- Sahajitpur, Distt.- Saran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Nalin Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Madan Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-05-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner’s

                   counsel are that the petitioner is innocent and he has been

                   falsely implicated in the present matter due to high-handedness

                   of the police and no liquor or incriminating article has been

                   recovered from the conscious possession or house of the

                   petitioner. It is further submitted that the alleged recovery has

                   been made from the open place namely inside the Nahar Bandh

                   area which is accessible to all and the house of the petitioner is

                   situated far away from the alleged place of recovery and the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31933 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     seizure list has not been prepared in accordance with law and no

                     independent witness has supported the alleged seizure and the

                     petitioner has been languishing in jail since 12.04.2026 and

                     except one antecedent, he has no further criminal antecedent.

                                  4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

                     for bail of the petitioner.

                                  5. In the facts and circumstances of this case, and

                     considering the statements made in the petition as well as the

                     above submissions, in my opinion, the petitioner deserves the

                     relief of bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be

                     released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees

                     Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

                     the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with

                     Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 50 of 2026.



                                               (Shailendra Singh, J)

maynaz/krishna
-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.