Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sushila KunwarversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The writ application is dismissed, and the petitioner is directed to file an application under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. or Section 358 of the BNSS for summoning the accused if additional evidence arises.

Summary

The petitioner, Sushila Kunwar, filed a writ application seeking to quash an order dated 10 September 2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with a criminal case (PS De​o Case No. 42 of 2015). The police investigation exonerated the accused persons identified as Nos. 2 and 3 (Rakesh Kumar and Pramila Devi) and a charge‑sheet was filed only against Yogendra Singh, resulting in cognizance being taken solely against him. The petitioner contended that the order should be set aside because the other accused were not being pursued. The High Court observed that when the police have cleared the accused and cognizance is not taken, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to file an application under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code or Section 358 of the Bihar Negotiable Security Act to summon the accused if new evidence emerges. Consequently, the writ application was dismissed, with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the lower court under the mentioned provisions.

Issues considered

  • When can a writ petition seeking quashal of a lower court order be entertained if the police investigation has exonerated certain accused?
  • Whether the petitioner should be directed to file an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. / Section 358 BNSS for summoning the accused instead of granting relief in the writ petition.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • quashing order
  • exoneration
  • cognizance
  • Section 319 CrPC
  • Section 358 BNSS
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32061 of 2016
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2015 Thana- DEV District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Sushila Kunwar Wife of late Amraindra Kumar Resident of Village- Simri
                 Tola Dudka, P.S. Deo District Aurangabad.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar
           2.    Rakesh Kumar Son of Yogendra Singh
           3.    Pramila Devi Wife of Yogindra Singh Both are Resident of Village- Simri
                 tola Dudka, P.S Deo District Aurangabad.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       None.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-01-2026                    None appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for

                   the State is present.

                                2. The present writ application has been filed for

                   quashing the order dated 10.09.2015 passed by the learned CJM,

                   Aurangabad in Tr. No. 780 of 2015 arising out of Deo P.S. Case

                   No. 42 of 2015.

                                3. In the present case, the police, after investigation

                   has submitted final form with regard to the opposite parties nos.

                   2 and 3 exonerating them and charge-sheet was submitted only

                   against Yogendra Singh and accordingly, cognizance was taken

                   only against Yogendra Singh and not against the opposite party

                   nos. 2 and 3. Because of the same, the petitioner is aggrieved by
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32061 of 2016(2) dt.08-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                    the impugned order.

                                 4. In the opinion of this Court, when the police, after

                    investigation has exonerated the opposite parties nos. 2 and 3

                    and cognizance has not been taken against the opposite party

                    nos. 2 and 3, the right course of action for the informant-

                    petitioner that she may have filed an application under Section

                    319 of the Cr.P.C. / under Section 358 of the BNSS for

                    summoning the accused if additional evidence comes during

                    trial.

                                 5. In view of the above, this application stands

                    dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to file an application in

                    the concerned Court below under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. /

                    under Section 358 of the BNSS.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.