Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Summary

Chotu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he posted private photographs of a woman on Facebook using a fake ID after she refused to marry him, violating Sections 74, 75, 351(2) and 352(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(E) and 67(A) of the Information Technology Act. The petitioner contended that the complaint was false, that the woman had been pressuring him to marry, and that there was no evidence he created the fake ID or posted the images. He is a 22‑year‑old student with a clean record, has been in custody since 28‑02‑2026, and a charge‑sheet has already been filed. The State opposed bail, but the court, considering the nature of the allegations, the petitioner’s antecedents, the filing of the charge‑sheet, and the length of custody, granted bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS. The bail order also stipulated cancellation of the bond if the petitioner commits a similar offence in the future.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act.
  • Whether the allegations and the petitioner’s personal circumstances justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • privacy
  • cyber offence
  • relationship dispute
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Information Technology Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32074 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2026 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Chotu Kumar S/o- Late Jodhan Mandal R/vill- Barohiya PS-Budhuchak Dist-
                 Bhagalpur.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Vivekanand Vivek, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Bhagalpur Mahila P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026

                   registered for the alleged offences under Sections 74, 75, 351(2)

                   and 352(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. and Section

                   66(E)/67(A) of Information Technology Act.

                                03. As per prosecution case, petitioner developed

                   intimacy with the informant and snapped some photographs and

                   videos of the informant. When the informant refused to marry

                   the petitioner, he put the private photographs of the informant

                   on Facebook creating fake ID.

                                04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32074 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
                                            2/3




          case. From the FIR, it is apparent that informant was in love

          with the petitioner. The informant is aged more than 25 years

          and she has been putting pressure on the petitioner who is aged

          about 22 years to marry her. When the petitioner refused, the

          informant became angry and filed this false case against the

          petitioner. Learned counsel further submits that no material has

          come on record to show that the petitioner created fake ID and

          posted the private photographs of the informant on Facebook.

          The petitioner is a student and has been preparing for

          competitive examination. The petitioner is having clean

          antecedent. The petitioner is in custody since 28.02.2026 and

          charge-sheet has been submitted.

                       05. Learned APP for the State opposes the submission

          made on behalf of the petitioner.

                       06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          nature of allegation in the background of relationship of the

          parties and also considering the period of custody of the

          petitioner and his clean antecedent along with submission of

          charge-sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

          thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32074 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX,

                     Bhagalpur/court concerned in connection with Bhagalpur

                     Mahila P.S. Case No. 10 of 2026, subject to the conditions

                     mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS and the following

                     conditions:

                                  (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of

                                  the petitioner.

                                  (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

                                  every date fixed by the court below.

                                  (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                                  or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail

                                  bond of the petitioner will be liable to be

                                  cancelled by the court concerned.

                                  07. However, if the petitioner is found involved in

                     similar nature of offence in the future, his bail bond will be

                     cancelled by the learned trial court.



                                                       (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Ashish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.