Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Byas Rai @ Saroj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and compliance with conditions under the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Byas Rai, was implicated in a case (PS No.603/2024) for alleged assault on an informant while grazing buffaloes, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He claimed the land was his, not the informant's, and that the incident stemmed from a land dispute, asserting innocence and a clean record. The State opposed bail, arguing the scuffle was a criminal act. The court considered the nature of the dispute, the minor injuries, and the petitioner’s antecedents, and granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.30,000 and specific conditions, including a family bailor and regular court appearances. The bail order was conditioned on compliance with Section 2(1)(d) and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in view of the alleged assault and related charges

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • land dispute
  • B.N.S.S. 2023
  • section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32120 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-603 Year-2024 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Byas Rai @ Saroj Kumar S/o Rameshwar Rai R/o Village- Rampur Jagdish,
                 P.S- Dariyapur, Dist- Saran.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Harish Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 603 of 2024 lodged on

                   24.10.2024, for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2),

                   115(2), 303(2), 109, 352 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   five named accused persons including the present petitioner. It

                   has been alleged that the petitioner was grazing his buffallo in

                   the informant’s field and when the informant opposed the same,

                   then the petitioner has assaulted the informant by lathi due to

                   which, injury has been caused.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

                   submits that the field in which the buffallo was grazing is not of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32120 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                            2/3




          the informant, but it is of the petitioner and it is a land dispute,

          due to which, the alleged occurrence took place. He submits that

          the injury report has been attached and it transpires from the

          injury report that the injuries are simple in nature. He further

          submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner but submits that on petty dispute, the

          scuffling took place.

                       6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of

          this case, let the above named petitioner be released on

          anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as

          mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the

          satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran, in connection

          with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 603 of 2024, subject to the

          conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 with

          further conditions:-

                       (i) one of the bailors should be the family member of

          the petitioner who shall provide official document to show

          his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32120 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026
                                                         3/3




                       on each and every scheduled date, and failure to do so for two

                       consecutive dates without any plausible reason/explanation shall

                       be resulted into cancellation of his bail bonds by the Trial Court

                       itself;



                                                                      (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.