Patna High Court
LADDU RAYversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
An application may be dismissed for non‑prosecution where the petitioner fails to appear and pursue the matter.
Summary
Laddu Ray filed an application before the Patna High Court but failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates (19-11-2025, 08-12-2025, and 16-12-2025). The court noted the petitioner’s apparent loss of interest in pursuing the matter. In the interest of justice, the court considered the petitioner’s non‑appearance as a failure to prosecute the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for non‑prosecution. No arguments were presented by the petitioner, while the respondent was represented by Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay. The dismissal was ordered by Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava.
Issues considered
- Whether an application can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the court?
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- non‑prosecution
- application dismissal
- default
- court procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32186 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2023 Thana- KHARIK District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Laddu Ray Son Of Mahindar Ray Resident Of Village - Tulsipur, P.S. -
Kharik, District - Bhagalpur (Bihar)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Guriya Devi Wife Of Santosh Mandal, Daughter Of Anil Ray Resident Of
Village - Tulsipur, P.S. - Kharik, District - Bhagalpur
3. Shola Devi Wife Of Anil Ray Resident Of Village - Tulsipur, P.S. - Kharik,
District - Bhagalpur
4. Rupesh Ray Son Of Anil Ray Resident Of Village - Tulsipur, P.S. - Kharik,
District - Bhagalpur
5. Anil Ray Son Of Late Borhan Ray Resident Of Village - Tulsipur, P.S. -
Kharik, District - Bhagalpur
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
4 09-01-2026 From the records of the case, it appears that no one
appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 19.11.2025 and even on
08.12.2025. However, in the interest of justice, the matter was
directed to be listed on 16.12.2025.
2. Today also, no one has appeared on behalf of the
petitioner to press the instant application. It appears that
petitioner has lost interest to pursue the matter.
3. In view of the above, the present application is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Harsh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.