Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Abujar @ AbuzarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The High Court dismissed the petition for quash, holding that interference at the stage where charges are framed and evidence is being taken is not warranted.

Summary

The petitioners, a group of relatives, filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 04‑03‑2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑2nd, Purnea, in connection with a criminal case (Kasba PS Case No. 297 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petition argued that the order should be set aside, but the court noted that the trial in the lower court had progressed substantially – charges had been framed and evidence was being taken. Relying on the principle that higher courts should not interfere at such an advanced stage of a criminal trial, the High Court held that the quash petition was devoid of merit. Consequently, the application for quashing was dismissed. The decision underscores the High Court’s reluctance to intervene once the trial has moved beyond the preliminary stages.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can quash the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate when the trial in the lower court has progressed to the stage of framing charges and taking evidence
  • Whether the petition for quash is maintainable at an advanced stage of the criminal proceedings

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • quash petition
  • jurisdiction
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Dowry Prohibition Act
  • stage of trial
  • higher court interference

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32275 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2023 Thana- KASBA District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md. Abujar @ Abuzar S/o Md. Jafar @ Abujafar, @ Abu Zafar R/o Village-
                  Kusana, PS- Kasba, Distt- Purnea
           2.    Md. Jafar @ Abujafar @ Abu Zafar S/o Late Ayub @ Manjoor @ Manzur
                 Alam R/o Village- Kusana, PS- Kasba, Distt- Purnea
           3.    Shnaj @ Bibi Sahnaz @ Sahnaz W/o Md. Jafar @ Abu Jafar @ Abuy Zafar
                 R/o Village- Kusana, PS- Kasba, Distt- Purnea
           4.    Abu Taliv @ Abu Talib S/o Md. Jafar @ Abu Jafar @ Abu Zafar R/o
                 Village- Kusana, PS- Kasba, Distt- Purnea
           5.    Nanhi @ Najvin @ Bibi Nazneen D/o Md. Jafar @ Abujafar , W/o Md.
                 Ansar R/o vill- Bochgaon, P.s.- Kasba, Distt.- Purnea
           6.    Abu Baka @ Abu Bakar Siddiuqe S/o Late Manjoor @ Late Md. Manzoo
                 Alam R/o vill - Majgawan, P.s- Kasba, Distt.- Purnea

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Rooksar Pravin W/o Md. Abujar, D/o Jamaluddin R/o vill - Kusaha, P.S.-
                 Kasba, Distt.- Purnea

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Gautam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   14-05-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioners have approached this Court for

                   quashing, the order dated 04.03.2024 passed by learned

                   A.C.J.M.-2nd, Purnea in connection with Kasba P.S. Case No.

                   297 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 506 and 34 of the I.P.C. and

                   Section ¾ of D.P. Act.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32275 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  3. Upon specific quarry from learned counsel for the

                     petitioners about the stage of the case in the Court below to

                     which learned counsel for the petitioners have fairly submitted

                     that by efflux of time, the stage in court below has considerably

                     changed, charges came to be framed and the evidences have also

                     started in this case.

                                  4. In view of such, this Court is not inclined to

                     interfere in the matter at this stage, this quashing application is

                     devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed.




shivam/-
                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.