Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, applied for regular bail in an excise case (No. 214 of 2026) alleging offences under sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the seized liquor and vehicle did not belong to him, and that no independent witness linked him to the seizure. The prosecution opposed the bail, relying on the FIR and seizure report. The court examined the lack of direct evidence, the petitioner’s young age, and the fact that the seizure witnesses were police officers, concluding that granting bail would not prejudice the prosecution. Accordingly, the court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the alleged offences under sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Whether the material seized and the FIR establish a sufficient connection between the petitioner and the alleged crime
  • Whether granting bail at this stage would prejudice the prosecution

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • excise law
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • section 30(a)
  • section 47
  • seizure of liquor
  • police testimony
  • suspicions
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32341 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Rahul Kumar, S/O Nand Lal Ray, R/O Village- Rasulpur Fatta, P.S.- Chera
                 Kala Khatra, District- Vaishali

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Aashish Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-05-2026                        Heard the parties.

                                2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Excise P.S. Case No. 214 of 2026 registered for the offences

                   punishable under sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act.

                                3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner’s

                   counsel are that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been

                   implicated in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion

                   and he has been languishing in jail since 07.04.2026. It is further

                   submitted that though the prosecution alleges recovery of

                   500.600 litres of foreign liquor and beer from a public vehicle

                   bearing registration No. WB330-7964, admittedly no recovery

                   has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It

                   is further submitted that from bare perusal of the FIR and seizure
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32341 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                                         2/2




                       list, it would appear that no independent witness was made to the

                       alleged search and seizure and there is no cogent or reliable

                       material connecting the petitioner with the seized liquor or the

                       vehicle in question and further, the seized vehicle neither belongs

                       to the petitioner nor he was the driver of the said vehicle.

                                    4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of

                       the petitioner.

                                    5. In the facts and circumstances of this case and

                       considering the statements made in the petition as well as above

                       submissions coupled with petitioner’s young age and also the fact

                       that the witnesses of the seizure are police personnel, so, the

                       release of the petitioner on bail at this stage will not affect the

                       prosecution in any manner, this Court is inclined to release him

                       on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be released

                       on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty

                       Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                       satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with Excise P.S.

                       Case No. 214 of 2026.



                                                 (Shailendra Singh, J)
annu/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.