Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Pappu @ PappuversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Pappu, was arrested in connection with an excise case alleging violation of Sections 30(a), 41 and 56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly transporting 210 litres of illicit country-made liquor in an e‑rickshaw. The prosecution claimed the e‑rickshaw was used for illicit liquor trade, while the petitioner contended he was merely a passenger and had no knowledge of the liquor. He has no prior criminal record and had been in custody since 19 March 2026. The court, after considering his clean antecedent, the nature of the allegation and the period of custody, granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS. The bail order also required the petitioner’s presence at court dates and stipulated cancellation of bail for non‑compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016 for alleged illicit liquor transport.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • passenger
  • clean antecedent
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32419 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1731 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Pappu @ Pappu S/O Md. Basir @ Md. Bashishtha R/O Dariyapur Fakir
                 Bara, P.S.- Pirbahare, Dist.- Patna.

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Saroj Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Patna Excise P.S. Case No. 1731 of 2026

                   registered for the alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 41,

                   56(b) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

                                03. As per prosecution case, an information was

                   received about trading of illicit liquor in an e-rickshaw. The said

                   e-rickshaw was intercepted and three persons including this

                   petitioner were apprehended when recovery of 210 liters of

                   country made chulai liquor was made from the said e-rickshaw.

                                04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. The petitioner was merely a passenger of the said e-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32419 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                            2/3




          rickshaw and co-accused Golu Kumar was the driver. The

          petitioner has not been knowing about the liquor being kept in

          three boxes of e-rickshaw. Merely on suspicion the petitioner

          has bee made accused in this case as he had been travelling in

          the said e-rickshaw as passenger. The petitioner has got no

          criminal history and is in custody since 19.03.2026. Learned

          counsel further submits that the rejection order mentioning the

          date of custody as 19.09.2025 is an error of record.

                       05. Learned APP for the State opposes the submission

          made on behalf of the petitioner.

                       06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          clean antecedent of the petitioner and nature of allegation and

          also considering the period of custody of the petitioner, the

          petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

          Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-3, Patna/court concerned in

          connection with Patna Excise P.S. Case No. 1731 of 2026,

          subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS

          and the following conditions:

                       (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32419 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  the petitioner.

                                  (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

                                  every date fixed by the court below.

                                  (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                                  or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail

                                  bond of the petitioner will be liable to be

                                  cancelled by the court concerned.



                                                       (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Ashish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.