Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nagina Das @ Nagina DaasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Nagina Das, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 13.715 kg of ganja seized from the bike of co‑accused Ramu Oraon. He contends that he was riding a different bike, fell while being chased, and that no contraband was found on his person, asserting false implication. The petitioner also argued that the police seizure did not comply with Section 105 of the BNSS and that the quantity involved is only of intermediate, not commercial, magnitude. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act. After hearing both sides, the Court found the petitioner's claims credible, noted his lack of prior criminal record and his custody since 09‑01‑2026, and consequently granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the seizure of the narcotic contraband complied with Section 105 of the BNSS.
  • Whether the quantity seized qualifies as intermediate quantity affecting bail considerations.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug seizure
  • intermediate quantity
  • false implication
  • police procedure
  • Section 105
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32531 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2026 Thana- GAUNAHA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Nagina Das @ Nagina Daas S/o- Bhikhi Das Village- Jigana PS- Manpur
                 Distt- West Champaran


                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    The Union of India thorugh NCB, Patna, Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Khushi Awadh, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State through virtual mode.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS

                   Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from

                   the bike of one Ramu Oraon, altogether 13.715 kg of Ganja like

                   contraband was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence and has been falsely implicated in the

                   present case. It is further submitted that the allegation against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32531 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner is that he was riding on another bike and while

          being chased, he fell down from the bike. Learned counsel

          further submits that nothing has been recovered from the

          possession of the petitioner; rather, the alleged recovery, if any,

          was made from the possession of co-accused Ramu Oraon. It is

          also submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police

          personnel, and the police have not complied with Section 105 of

          the BNSS while effecting the seizure. It is further submitted that

          the alleged recovery of contraband is though more than small

          quantity but is much less than commercial quantity and falls

          within the category of intermediate quantity. Moreover, a

          statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner

          has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial

          custody since 09.01.2026.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

          for the State.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

          petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32531 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     of Exclusive Special Judge, (N.D.P.S.), West Champaran,

                     Bettiah in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.