Patna High Court
Nagina Das @ Nagina DaasversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
Summary
The petitioner, Nagina Das, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 13.715 kg of ganja seized from the bike of co‑accused Ramu Oraon. He contends that he was riding a different bike, fell while being chased, and that no contraband was found on his person, asserting false implication. The petitioner also argued that the police seizure did not comply with Section 105 of the BNSS and that the quantity involved is only of intermediate, not commercial, magnitude. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act. After hearing both sides, the Court found the petitioner's claims credible, noted his lack of prior criminal record and his custody since 09‑01‑2026, and consequently granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act.
- Whether the seizure of the narcotic contraband complied with Section 105 of the BNSS.
- Whether the quantity seized qualifies as intermediate quantity affecting bail considerations.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances (Control) Act — s. 105
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 20(b)(ii)(B), 8
Subjects
- bail
- NDPS Act
- drug seizure
- intermediate quantity
- false implication
- police procedure
- Section 105
- criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32531 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2026 Thana- GAUNAHA District- West Champaran
======================================================
Nagina Das @ Nagina Daas S/o- Bhikhi Das Village- Jigana PS- Manpur
Distt- West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Union of India thorugh NCB, Patna, Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Khushi Awadh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 18-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State through virtual mode.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail registered for the
offence punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS
Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from
the bike of one Ramu Oraon, altogether 13.715 kg of Ganja like
contraband was recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has
committed no offence and has been falsely implicated in the
present case. It is further submitted that the allegation against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32531 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
2/3
the petitioner is that he was riding on another bike and while
being chased, he fell down from the bike. Learned counsel
further submits that nothing has been recovered from the
possession of the petitioner; rather, the alleged recovery, if any,
was made from the possession of co-accused Ramu Oraon. It is
also submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police
personnel, and the police have not complied with Section 105 of
the BNSS while effecting the seizure. It is further submitted that
the alleged recovery of contraband is though more than small
quantity but is much less than commercial quantity and falls
within the category of intermediate quantity. Moreover, a
statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner
has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial
custody since 09.01.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP
for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named
petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32531 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
3/3
of Exclusive Special Judge, (N.D.P.S.), West Champaran,
Bettiah in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.