Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Deepak Kumar Sah @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail as the alleged conduct does not amount to a serious injury and the prosecution evidence is insufficient, allowing bail under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was charged in Simri Bakhtiyarpur PS Case No.311 of 2025 under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for allegedly pelting stones, brick‑battering and damaging the informant's vehicle during a land‑execution operation. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, attacked the informant’s party, causing injury and vehicle damage. The petitioner contended that only property damage occurred, no assault on the informant, the injury was minor and reported late, and he had no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, but the court noted the lack of serious injury, the similarity of co‑accused who had been granted bail, and the adequacy of bail conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Consequently, the court ordered bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions, and allowed the application.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 despite charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the alleged acts constitute a serious offence that warrants denial of bail.
  • Whether the prosecution evidence regarding injury to the informant is sufficient to justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • property damage
  • assault
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • Section 482
  • Criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32645 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2025 Thana- SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR District-
                                                         Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Deepak Kumar Sah @ Deepak Kumar, aged about 28 years, Male, S/O
                 Budhan Sah, R/O Village- Bhatauni, P.S- Simri Bakhiyarpur, Distt.- Saharsa
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                      Versus

                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Udai Shankar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with

                   Simri Bakhtiyarpur PS Case No.311 of 2025 dated 13.10.2025,

                   instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109,

                   324(4), 132, 223, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date of

                   occurrence, the informant arrived at Bhatauni, Police Station

                   Simri Bakhtiyarpur District- Saharsa, to take possession in light

                   of direction issued by the court of Munsif, Simri Bakhtiyarpur

                   in Title Execution Casse No. 01/2010. For compliance and

                   executing the order passed in Title Execution Case No.01/2010,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32645 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
                                            2/3




          Circle Officer, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, with Government Amin, one

          Inspector along with four male constable and two female

          constable also reached there. At the disputed plot S.H.O. along

          with police force were present there. By order of Circle Officer

          the disputed land was marked and order of the Civil Court was

          communicated there and thereafter execution proceeding was

          started, after an hour, family members of the accused person

          came there with lathi, danda, brick, stone and red chilli powder,

          and attacked on them. It is further alleged that co-accused Amit

          Kumar, assaulted the informant on his head by means of iron

          rod due to which he sustained injury, and fell down. It is further

          alleged that Deepak Sah (petitioner) and Budhan Sah started

          pelting the stone on the informant and his associates, as a result

          mirror of the vehicle got broken. It is further alleged that female

          member of the Budhan Sah's family, threw red chilli powder.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          allegation against the petitioner is that he pelted stones and was

          involved in brick-batting due to which the car of the informant

          got damaged. There is no allegation of assault on the person of

          the informant. Further submission is that the informant was

          examined by the doctor after two days of the occurrence and the

          injury sustained by the informant is said to be simple in nature
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32645 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
                                                        3/3




                      caused within six hours which itself falsifies the prosecution

                      case. Further, it is submitted that similarly situated co-accused,

                      Budhan Sah, has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of

                      this Court vide order dated 06.05.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.

                      29942 of 2026. Lastly, the petitioner has no criminal

                      antecedents.

                                   5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

                                   6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

                      the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in

                      the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within

                      six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon

                      furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                      Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in Simri Bakhtiyarpur PS

                      Case No.311 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in

                      Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

                      2023.

                                   7. The application stands allowed.


                                                                   (Khatim Reza, J)
J. Alam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.