Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raja Chaudhary @ Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a Rs.30,000 bond and verification of his criminal antecedent.

Summary

Petitioner Raja Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 50 litres of country-made liquor was recovered from his joint family house. The petitioner claimed innocence, a clean criminal record, and that no liquor was found in his personal possession. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The High Court, after hearing both sides, granted anticipatory bail on the condition that the petitioner furnish a bail bond of Rs.30,000 and comply with verification of his criminal antecedent, with the provision that bail may be cancelled if concealment is discovered. The order directed that the bail bond be accepted without delay pending verification.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 in the present liquor offence case.
  • Whether the absence of liquor in the petitioner's personal possession justifies granting bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean criminal antecedent and willingness to comply with conditions warrant bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • BNSS 2023
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • liquor seizure
  • criminal antecedent
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32659 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2026 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Raja Chaudhary @ Raja Kumar S/o Shree Ram Chaudhary Resident of
                 Village- Gandhi Chowk Gadaha, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran,
                 Motihari

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Dhandev Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-05-2026                        Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and

                   Learned APP for the State.

                                2. The present criminal miscellaneous application has

                   been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                   Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS, 2023’) for

                   grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who apprehends his

                   arrest in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 100 of 2026,

                   lodged on 27.02.2026,            under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                                3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   three named accused persons including the present petitioner.

                   Total recovery of 50 litres of country made liquor has been

                   made which is the subject matter of the present case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32659 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

          also submits that the recovery of alleged country made liquor

          has been made from the joint old family house of petitioner. He

          submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious

          possession of the petitioner. Counsel submits that the criminal

          antecedent of the petitioner is clean. Counsel further submits

          that petitioner is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever

          shall be imposed upon him.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner and submits that from the record, it

          transpires that neither recovery of alleged country made liquor

          has been made from the petitioner’s possession nor he was

          apprehended from the place of occurrence.

                       6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of

          this case, let the above named petitioner be released on

          anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today, on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand)

          as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the

          satisfaction of Exclusive Special Excise Court-III, East

          Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32659 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     No. 100 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s

                     482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

                                  7. And further condition that the Trial Court shall

                     verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                     any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                     criminal antecedent, the Trial Court shall take step for

                     cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.               However, the

                     acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order

                     shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                     verification.



                                                                      (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Mkr./Bipin/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.