Patna High Court
RAJESH YADAV @ RAJESH KUMAR YADAVversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and conditions, finding no statutory impediment under the NDPS Act.
Summary
Petitioner Rajesh Yadav was arrested on 11 January 2026 in connection with NDPS Case No. 52 of 2025 for alleged possession of 10 kg of ganja and 3 g of brown sugar recovered from his house during a raid. The FIR alleged that the contraband was concealed in the house, but none was found in the petitioner's conscious possession. The petitioner argued that the quantity was below the commercial threshold, that his father (a co‑accused) had been granted bail, and that the charge‑sheet had already been filed. The State opposed bail, citing the recovery from the house and a prior case, though that case was disposed of in Lok Adalat. The Court considered the nature of the seizure, the non‑commercial quantity, and the precedent of the father's bail, and granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and several conditions, including cooperation with the trial and no tampering with evidence.
Issues considered
- Whether bail can be granted under the NDPS Act when the seized narcotic quantity is below the commercial threshold.
- Whether the recovery of narcotics from the house, rather than from the petitioner's conscious possession, affects the bail decision.
- Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent and the bail granted to a co‑accused (his father) influence the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985 — s. 20(b)(ii)(B), 21(a), 29, 37, 8, 8(c)
Subjects
- bail
- NDPS Act
- narcotics seizure
- commercial quantity
- search and seizure
- criminal antecedent
- court precedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32831 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2025 Thana- RATANPUR District- Supaul
======================================================
RAJESH YADAV @ RAJESH KUMAR YADAV S/O DEVNARAYAN
YADAV R/o vill - Satanpatti, ward no. 11, P.S.- Ratanpura, Distt.- Supaul
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Narain Chaudhary, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Matloob Rab, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 13-05-2026 Heard Mr. Murari Narain Chaudhary, learned
counsel for the petitioner and Md. Matloob Rab, learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
11.01.2026 in connection with NDPS Case No. 52 of 2025,
arising out of Ratanpura P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025 for the
offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B), 8(c) 21(a)
and 29 of the NDPS Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, as alleged in
the First Information Report had taken place in between the
period 6:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M. on 17.05.2025, when a raid was
conducted by the informant at the house of this petitioner,
regarding which the F.I.R. had been lodged on the next day at
about 12:45 P.M., by one Raghav Kumar Jha, the Inspector in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32831 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
2/5
S.S.B., 45th Bt, alleging inter-alia that the informant at about
5.30 P.M. on 17.05.2025 had received a secret information that
Devnarayan Yadav of village Satanpatti had concealed narcotic
substance in huge quantity inside his house and after giving this
information to the Asst Commandant, the informant after
constituting a team, consisting of 4 male and 2 female force
with narcotic test kit as well as A.S.I. and 2 police force of
Ratanpura Police Station, after arriving in the village,
surrounded the house of Devnarayan Yadav. It is alleged that
prior to conducting joint raid, the neighboring persons were
asked to become witness of the search but nobody became ready
for it, hence two of the force of nearing border post were
included in the search operation as independent apprised with
this fact that search was being made as he had concealed
narcotic substance inside his house. hence he was having right
to get the search conducted in presence of either Gazetted
Officer of S.S.B./Police or any Magistrate, upon which he
became ready for S.S.B. official, hence the Asst Commandant
was informed and in his presence, a search of the house was
made. It is further alleged that during course of search, two
small bag, containing 10 plastic packing, having 10 kg of Ganza
and 3 gm Brown Sugar was found, regarding which he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32831 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
3/5
confessed that he used to bring those items from Nepal for the
purposes of selling it and he further disclosed that he was doing
this illegal business since before with his both the sons, namely
Rajesh Yadav and Lalan Yadav, hence the recovered items, after
being properly seized, were handed over to the Ratanpura Police
for further action.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it
appears from the FIR and seizure list that nothing has been
recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather
the recovery has been made from the house of the petitioner and
altogether 10 kg of Ganza and 3 gm of Brown Sugar was
recovered from the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel for
the petitioner submits that for the same set of allegation
similarly situated co-accused person, namely, Devnarayan
Yadav, who is happened to be father of the petitioner, has been
granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order
dated 15.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 71669 of 2025. Apart
from aforesaid, the recovered contraband is less than the
commercial quantity so there is no embargo of Section 37 of the
NDPS Act to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the police after
investigation has submitted charge-sheet and petitioner is in
custody since 11.01.2026.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32831 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
4/5
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State
has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and
submits that recovery has been made from the house of the
petitioner and petitioner has antecedent of one case other than
the present case but fairly submits that the case has been
disposed of in the Lok Adalat itself in the year 2025.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District
and Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, Supaul/In Charge
Successor Court in connection with NDPS Case No. 52 of 2025,
arising out of Ratanpura P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025, subject to the
following conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32831 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
5/5
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.