Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. AshrafversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

The Court inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to bond and sureties.

Summary

The High Court considered bail applications filed by three petitioners accused of carrying a juvenile for the purpose of trafficking, offences punishable under Section 143(V) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and Section 3 of the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986. The petitioners contended that they were taken for work due to extreme poverty and that their parents’ affidavits affirmed the absence of coercion. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the alleged trafficking offence. The Court, noting the short period of custody, lack of prior criminal records and the pending trial, decided to grant bail subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties. The order expressly limited its observations to the bail application and clarified that they do not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to accused persons charged with juvenile trafficking under the specified statutes.
  • Whether the nature of the offence, custody period and lack of antecedents justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • juvenile trafficking
  • child labour
  • Juvenile Justice Act
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23900 of 2026
                 Arising out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2026 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR RAIL P.S. District- Saran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Shahidul Haque S/o Ajahar Ali Resident Of Village- Soidpur, P.s.-
                  Karmdehi, Dist.- North Dinajpur, W.B.
           2.    Afsar Alam Son of Noor Islam @ Nurul Islam Resident of village-
                 Babangama @ Bamangram, ward no. 12, P.S. Raiganj, District- Raiganj
                 (W.B.)
           3.    Tanvir Alam Son of Rajaul Haque Resident of village- Shikarpur Dalkola,
                 P.S.- Chakaliya, District- North Dinajpur (W.B.)

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                                         with
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 32857 of 2026
                 Arising out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2026 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR RAIL P.S. District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Ashraf S/O Afsar Alam @ Md Afsar R/O Village- Silampur, Ward no. 5,
                 PS- Balrampur, Distt- Katihar

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23900 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pathak, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 32857 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Md. Helal Ahmad, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-05-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                             2. The petitioners seek bail in Muzaffarpur Rail P.S.

                   Case No.        08 of 2026, registered for the alleged offence
     Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23900 of 2026(3) dt.19-05-2026
                                 2/3




punishable under Sections 143(V) of B.N.S. and Section 79 of

J.J. Act 2015 along with Sections 3 of 2014 of Child Adolescent

Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986.

          3. The allegation is that the petitioners are alleged to

be carrying Juvenile for the purposes of trafficking.

            4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

they were being taken for work and they left under extreme

poverty and were trying to support their family. Their parents

have filed affidavits stating that no coercion was involved.

          5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

          6. Considering the period of custody and absence of

criminal antecedents against the petitioners and the fact that

they have to face trial, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the

petitioners.

          7.    Let     the     petitioners,        above      named,   be

released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

Railway Judicial Magistrate, Sonepur, in connection

with Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026.

           8. It is made clear that any observation made
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23900 of 2026(3) dt.19-05-2026
                                           3/3




           herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for

           the purpose of           adjudication of             the    present   bail

           application. Such observations shall not be construed

           as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not

           influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

           manner.



                                          (Ansul, J)
Vikash/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.