Patna High Court
Kanhaiya KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, sought regular bail in a case registered under sections 309(5), 109(1) and 3(5) of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was implicated only through a co‑accused's confessional statement and not named in the FIR. The prosecution alleged that masked miscreants attempted to loot an informant's shop, but no material was recovered from the petitioner and CCTV footage showed masked faces, making identification impossible. The petitioner had been in judicial custody since 6 May 2025, while the State opposed bail citing four prior criminal cases. After hearing both sides, the court found the evidence insufficient to justify continued detention and ordered the petitioner’s release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The bail order was directed to be complied with by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Begusarai.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the allegations and his prior criminal antecedents
- Whether the confessional statement of a co‑accused and masked CCTV footage constitute sufficient grounds to deny bail
Legislation cited
Subjects
- regular bail
- criminal antecedent
- confessional statement
- identification
- CCTV footage
- Arms Act
- section 27
- BNS
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32914 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2025 Thana- Ratanpur District- Begusarai
======================================================
Kanhaiya Kumar son of Krishnandan Singh @ Kisannandan Singh Resident
of Village -Sihma PS -Matihani Distt -Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Khushi Awadh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Asha Devi, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 14-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case
registered for the offence punishable under sections 309(5), 109(1)
and 3(5) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that certain miscreants
entered the shop of the informant and they attempted to loot but
they were not successful in the act.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned
counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the FIR, all the
miscreants have masked their faces. The petitioner is not named in
FIR rather his name has transpired on the basis of confessional
statement of co-accused Mayanak Kumar. Save and except
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32914 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
2/2
confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against this
petitioner. As far as CCTV footage is concerned, according to the
case of the prosecution, the miscreants have masked their face, as
such, there is no chance of identification. Nothing has been
recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Moreover, he is
languishing in judicial custody since 06.05.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently
opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner
is having criminal antecedent of four cases.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named
petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with
Ratanpur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of
Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class,
Begusarai.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-
Sneha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.