Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Upendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail, subject to conditions prescribed under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.

Summary

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under several offences of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, including extortion, assault, and robbery. The allegation was that petitioner No.1 demanded Rs.50,000 and threatened the informant, while petitioner No.2 allegedly assaulted the informant with a sharp iron rod, causing serious injuries, and co‑accused stole money and a gold chain. The petitioners argued that the injuries were simple, that there is a civil dispute and counter‑case, and that they have no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail, contending the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 76, 308(3) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
  • Whether the alleged conduct and seriousness of the offences justify denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioners' lack of prior criminal antecedents and the existence of a civil dispute affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • extortion
  • assault
  • robbery
  • Section 482
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33151 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- JANKINAGAR District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
           1.     Upendra Yadav S/o Late Sundar Lal Yadav Resident of Village - Rupauli
                  Gauth ward No. 7, P.S - Jankinagar, District - Purnea
           2.    Sujeet Kumar S/o Upendra Yadav R/o Village - Rupauli Gauth Ward No. 7,
                 P.S - Jamkinagar, District - Purnea
           3.     Sushila Devi W/o Upendra Yadav R/o Village - Rupauli Gauth Ward No. 7,
                  P.S - Jamkinagar, District - Purnea
                                                                           ... ... Petitioners
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioners    :        Mr. Anirudh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :        Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                  2. This application for anticipatory bail arises out

                   of Jankinagar P.S. Case No. 24 of 2026, registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2), 109, 76,

                   308(3), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                  3. As per allegation, petitioner No.1 demanded

                   Rs.50,000.00 as extortion money and had threatened to kill the

                   informant, if he does not accede to his demand. It is alleged that

                   when the informant refused, he called his son Sujeet Kumar,

                   petitioner No.2, who came with a sharp iron rod and struck the

                   informant on his head with an intention to kill, causing serious
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33151 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
                                            2/3




          injuries. It has further been alleged that when informant’s wife

          Asha Devi and his sons Prabhakar and Diwakar came to his

          rescue, they were also assaulted by sticks and iron rods. It has

          further been alleged that during the intervening assault, co-

          accused Santosh Kumar Suman took out Rs.5,000.00 from the

          informant’s pocket, while co-accused Sanjay Kumar snatched

          gold chain from the neck of informant’s wife.

                          4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

          that the injuries sustained by the informant is simple in nature,

          and the same is specifically attributed to petitioner No.2. It has

          further been submitted that there is case and counter case

          between the parties and a civil litigation is also pending between

          the parties. In the counter case, petitioners’ side has also

          received injuries, which has remained unexplained. It has lastly

          been submitted that though the injuries sustained by the

          informant is grievous, but that is not specifically attributed to

          these petitioners and the petitioners have got no criminal

          antecedents.

                          5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer

          of anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                       6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                       7. Considering the facts and circumstances, let the
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33151 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
                                                      3/3




                    petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender

                    within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on

                    bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

                    each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                    of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Purnea, in

                    connection with Jankinagar P.S. Case No. 24 of 2026, subject to

                    the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya

                    Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.



                                               (Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.