Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sonu Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail, directing his release upon furnishing the prescribed bail bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar Mahto, a driver of a pick‑up van, was implicated in a case where 271.800 litres of illicit foreign liquor were seized. He contended that no liquor was found in his possession, that the seizure list was prepared solely by police without complying with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S., and that he had no knowledge of the consignment or prior criminal record. The State opposed his regular bail application. The Court examined the lack of direct possession, procedural deficiencies in the seizure documentation, and the petitioner's clean antecedents, and consequently ordered his release on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The bail was to be supervised by the Exclusive Special Excise Judge‑I, Bhagalpur.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite being implicated in the seizure of illicit liquor under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act.
  • Whether the alleged non‑compliance with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. in preparing the seizure list warrants bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • excise offence
  • illegal liquor seizure
  • procedural lapse
  • driver liability
  • Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33213 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-452 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Sonu Kumar Mahto, S/O Sunil Mahto, Resident of Village- Sarkanda Toyodi,
                 Police Station- Godda, Distt.- Godda (Jharkhand).

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   21-05-2026                     Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State through Video Conferencing.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 47 of

                   Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that, from a

                   pick-up van, altogether 271.800 liters of illicit foreign liquor

                   was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that, nothing has been recovered from the possession of this

                   petitioner. It is also submitted that all the witnesses to the

                   seizure list are police personnel, and the police have not

                   complied the mandatory provisions of Section 105 of the

                   B.N.S.S. while making the Seizure List. Learned counsel for the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33213 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     petitioner also submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has

                     falsely been implicated in this case. It is also stated submitted

                     that petitioner is merely the driver of the pick-up van and he is

                     having no knowledge regarding the consignment. It has further

                     been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that

                     petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in custody

                     since 19.03.2026.

                                  5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                     vehemently opposed the prayer of the regular bail.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on

                     bail. The above-named petitioner is directed to be released on

                     bail in connection with Excise (Sadar) P.S. Case No. 452 of

                     2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with

                     two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                     learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I, Bhagalpur/concerned

                     Court.


                                           (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

khushbu/Ritwika

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.