Patna High Court
Azad Khan @ Ahad KhanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a cash bond, sureties, and specific conditions.
Summary
Azad Khan was arrested on 23 March 2026 in connection with a 2024 FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. An earlier anticipatory bail order dated 8 January 2025 could not be acted upon because the court found a criminal antecedent, and a request to modify that order was dismissed on 23 September 2025. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, that the assault allegation pertained to a co‑accused, and that other co‑accused had already been granted bail. The prosecution opposed bail, citing five prior criminal cases against the petitioner, though noting he was on bail in another pending matter. The court, after considering the circumstances, granted bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, presence in court, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to a petitioner charged with multiple serious offences despite having prior criminal antecedents.
- Whether the earlier anticipatory bail order can be modified or superseded after its dismissal.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 — s. 109, 115, 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5)
Subjects
- bail
- anticipatory bail
- criminal antecedent
- serious offences
- Arms Act
- Bihar High Court
- court conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33276 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Azad Khan @ Ahad Khan S/o Late Jan Mohammad Khan Resident of
Village- Nakardei, Ps- Sugauli, District- East Champaran Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 15-05-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
23.03.2026 in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 321 of
2024, F.I.R. dated 19.07.2024 for the offences punishable under
Sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the
BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Earlier the anticipatory bail application of the
petitioner was allowed vide order dated 08.01.2025 passed in
Cr. Misc. No. 89048 of 2024 by this Court but the bail bond of
the petitioner could not be furnished due to criminal antecedent
of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner has moved before this
Court for modification of the order dated 08.01.2025 which was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33276 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
2/3
dismissed vide order dated 23.09.2025.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the
present case. He further submits that there is case and counter
case between the parties and the specific allegation of assault is
against the co-accused, namely, Mintu Khan who has assaulted
to the victim due to which he received injury but his injury
report suggest that the injury is simple in nature. As per the
allegation, there is no specific allegation of assault against this
petitioner and number of co-accused persons have been granted
bail by this Court and by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The
petitioner is in custody since 23.03.2026.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has
vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the
ground that petitioner carries five criminal antecedents other
than the present one but fairly submits that he is on bail in the
pending matter.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st
Class, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Sugauli
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33276 of 2026(2) dt.15-05-2026
3/3
P.S. Case No. 321 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.