Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Yogendra SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is warranted as the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the circumstances do not justify continued detention.

Summary

The petitioner, Yogendra Sah, was arrested after 159.9 litres of Nepali liquor were seized from a tempo he owned, leading to charges under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He surrendered on 17 March 2026 and has been in custody since then. The petitioner argued that the liquor was in the possession of his driver, Sanjay Paswan, and that he has no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, relying on the allegations in the FIR. The Court, after considering the facts and the petitioner’s clean record, ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the Special Judge Excise, Madhubani.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged under Sections 272, 273 IPC and Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illegal liquor
  • IPC 272
  • IPC 273
  • Bihar Prohibition Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33312 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2020 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Yogendra Sah S/O Rajendra Sah Resident of Village- Bajraha, PS. - Bisfi,
                 District- Madhubani

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shashi Kant, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   14-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

                   the offence punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the

                   Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, 159.9 litres of

                   Nepali liquor was recovered from a Tempo bearing

                   Registration No.BR32PA-2054.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the alleged liquor has been recovered from a Tempo and the

                   name of the petitioner has transpired as he is the registered

                   owner of the said Tempo, however, he had given the same to

                   his driver, namely, Sanjay Paswan to run the same on daily
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33312 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
                                                          2/2




                        basis. The petitioner has surrendered on 17.03.2026 and is in

                        custody since then.

                                       5. Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of

                        bail on the basis of allegations made in the First Information

                        Report.

                                       6. Taking into consideration the facts and

                        circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, who

                        has no criminal antecedent, be released on bail on furnishing

                        bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                        sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

                        learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise, Madhubani/concerned

                        Court below in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 71 of

                        2020.



                                                  (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.