Patna High Court
Prabhu Prasad @ Prabhu Prasad KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SHAILENDRA SINGH
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to bond and surety conditions.
Summary
Petitioners Prabhu Prasad and Fulmati Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged assault under several sections of the BNS. They contended that the incident arose from a construction‑related altercation, that petitioner 1 was himself injured and that the alleged injuries to the informant were caused by a blunt object, not a sharp weapon as claimed by the prosecution. The State argued that petitioner 1 used a sharp weapon to inflict serious injury. The court noted the lack of corroborative medical evidence of a severe head injury, the presence of a counter‑case, and the fact that a co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the court granted anticipatory bail to both petitioners subject to a bond of Rs 20,000 and two sureties, under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners given the nature of the alleged offences and the evidence of injuries.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Negotiable (BNS) — s. 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352
- Bihar Negotiable (BNSS) — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- assault
- injury
- construction dispute
- BNS offences
- Section 482(2)
- bond conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33339 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2026 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran
======================================================
1. Prabhu Prasad @ Prabhu Prasad Kushwaha, S/o Late Ramlakhan Prasad @
Ramlakhan Prasad Kushwaha R/o vill - Mahnagni, Ward no. 10, P.S.-
Bettiah (Mufasil), Distt.- West Champaran
2. Fulmati Devi W/o Late Ramlakhan Prasad @ Ramlakhan Prasad Kushwaha
R/o vill - Mahnagni, Ward No. 10, P.S.- Bettiah (Mufasil), Distt.- West
Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 14-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in
connection with Bettiah Muffasil P. S. Case No. 51 of 2026
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2),
126(2). 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
both the parties are agnates and in fact on the day of alleged
occurrence from petitioners' side, a construction work relating to
a stair-case carried out due to which an altercation took place in
between both the parties, in which both sides sustained injuries
and the petitioner no. 1 himself was one of the injured and he
remained under treatment between 14.01.2026 to 17.01.2026
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33339 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
2/3
and in this regard his discharge receipt has been filed with this
petition. Learned counsel further submits that as per the
allegation, the petitioner no.1 inflicted a farsa blow on the head
of the informant, Rupesh Kumar but no corresponding injury to
the head of the informant corroborating the allegation of use of
farsa was found and the injuries found on his person were
opined to have been caused by hard and blunt object and were
found to be simple in nature. It is further submitted that against
the petitioner no. 2 who is 76 year old lady, there is no serious
allegation and she simply caught hold of the informant during
the course of occurrence as alleged. It is lastly submitted that
one co-accused namely, Sobha Devi carrying serious allegation
as to causing fracture injury to the informant's mother has been
granted anticipatory bail by the coordinate Bench of this court
vide order dated 13.05.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33024 of
2026. It is further submitted that the alleged occurrence was not
pre-planned and there is case and counter case in between both
the parties.
4. Learned APP for the State opposes the bail prayer
of the petitioners and submits that against the petitioner no.1
there is serious allegation and he used sharp weapon to cause
injury on the vital part of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33339 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
3/3
5. In the facts and circumstances of this case and
considering the statements made in the petition as well as above
submissions and the nature of the injury sustained by the
informant, coupled with the nature of allegation appearing
against the petitioner no.1 as well as the genesis of the
occurrence as stated above, this court is inclined to grant the
relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, let the
petitioners named-above, in the event of their arrest/surrender
before the learned court below within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with
Bettiah Muffasil P. S. Case No. 51 of 2026 on furnishing bail
bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court
concerned, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
482(2) of the BNSS.
(Shailendra Singh, J)
Rajiv/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.