Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Nut @ Kundan NutversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the recovery of illicit liquor was not made from the petitioner's conscious possession, warranting the grant of anticipatory bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, based on the recovery of 16 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in his name. He contended that he was not present at the scene, the bike was lent to a neighbour, and the liquor was not in his conscious possession. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed his anticipatory bail application. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that the recovery did not appear to be from the petitioner's direct possession. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, subject to a bond and sureties, under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The bail order was conditioned on surrender within four weeks and compliance with the special judge’s directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 of the CrPC in view of the alleged illegal liquor trade.
  • Whether ownership of the motorcycle used to transport the liquor establishes the petitioner's participation in the offence.
  • Whether the recovery of illicit liquor from the vehicle constitutes sufficient grounds to deny bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • CrPC Section 438
  • BNSS Section 482
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33369 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-525 Year-2023 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Nut @ Kundan Nut S/o Dudhnath Nut @
                 Dudhnath Nut R/o vill - Bazid Bhoraha/ Bajitbhoraha, P.S.- Madhaurah,
                 Distt.- Saran at Chapra

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :        Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :        Mr.Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   29-06-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Mashrakh P.S.

                   Case No.525 of 2023 registered under Section 30(a) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   total recovery of 16 litres IMFL/country-made liquor from

                   the petitioner and other, namely, Dinesh Kumar.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the name of this petitioner arrayed solely
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33369 of 2026(3) dt.29-06-2026
                                            2/3




          for the reason that the petitioner is the owner of motorcycle

          bearing Registration No. BR04AM- 5104,which was involved

          in carrying illicit liquor. It is also submitted that the

          petitioner was neither present at the place of occurrence nor

          the petitioner is in any way connected with the alleged

          liquor. It is further argued that the bike of petitioner was

          given to his neighbour for doing some personal work. It is

          also submitted that recovery of illicit liquor was not made

          from conscious possession of this petitioner. Explaining

          criminal antecedent, it is submitted that the petitioner found

          involved in 7 more criminal cases, where he is on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33369 of 2026(3) dt.29-06-2026
                                                           3/3




                         Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                         satisfaction of the learned Court of Spl. (Special) Judge

                         Excise-02, “Saran at Chapra, in connection with Mashrakh

                         P.S. Case No.525 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid

                         down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section

                         482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                                 (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

aniket/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.