Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jitu @ Jitendra RajbanshiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Jitu @ Jitendra Rajbanshi, was implicated in a case (S.P.S. No.55 of 2026) for allegedly selling illegal country-made liquor, with police claiming to have seized 110 litres from his field under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The petitioner contended that the seizure was fabricated, that the field was open to all, and that he had no involvement in the alleged offence, though he has a prior criminal record unrelated to the present charge. The State opposed the petition for anticipatory bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and several conditions regarding court attendance and conduct. The order emphasized that any observations made would not affect the trial, and the bail could be cancelled if conditions are breached.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in view of the alleged offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
  • Whether the allegations of false implication and lack of seizure from the petitioner's field warrant denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition Act
  • Section 30
  • bail conditions
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33428 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2026 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Jitu @ Jitendra Rajbanshi, S/o Bharat Rajbanshi, R/o Rabio, P.S. - Sirdala,
                 Dist. - Nawada.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                                  ORAL ORDER


2   18-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State through virtual mode.

                                 2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with

                   Sirdala P.S. Case No. 55 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   under Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment)

                   Act, 2022.

                                 3. The prosecution case is to the effect that the police

                   got secret information that the accused is selling illegal wine

                   from his Khalihan, upon which a raid was conducted and one

                   person managed to flee from the Khalihan and the local persons

                   and chowkidar disclosed the name of the said person as Jitu @
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33428 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
                                            2/4




          Jitendra Rajbanshi (petitioner). On search total 110 liters of

          country made liquor was recovered from the Khalihan of the

          petitioner.

                        4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case and no

          such seizure has been made from his Khalihan. It has further

          been submitted that the co-villagers, in connivance with the

          local chowkidar, have falsely implicated this petitioner, who has

          no concern whatsoever with the alleged seized illicit liquor. It

          has next been submitted that the liquor has been recovered from

          an open field which was accessible by all and therefore, the

          petitioner has falsely been implicated in the said case cannot be

          ruled out. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has one

          criminal antecedent, but it is not of the offence as alleged in the

          present case.

                        5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

          for anticipatory bail.

                        6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, let the

          petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail, in the

          event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33428 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
                                            3/4




          bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below

          where the case is pending/successor court in connection with

          Sirdala P.S. Case No. 55 of 2026, subject to the conditions as

          laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

          Procedure read with corresponding Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

          as well as subject to the following conditions:-

                          (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close
                          relative.
                          (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in
                          Court on each date of the trial.
                          (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates, or in
                          violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the
                          petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court
                          concerned.
                          (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature
                          of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty
                          to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
                          (v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal
                          antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is
                          found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
                          antecedent, the court below shall take step for
                          cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
                          acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-
                          mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or
                          in the name of verification.

                       7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is

          allowed.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33428 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
                                                          4/4




                                     8. It is made clear that the observation, if any, made in

                        this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                                 (Sourendra Pandey, J)
manoj/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.