Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sachin Paswan @ Sachin Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and sureties under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

Sachin Paswan was named in FIR No. 493 of 2025 for alleged assault and use of criminal force against a public servant who came to his village to make arrests. The petitioner argued that no overt act was attributable to him and that his inclusion was merely on suspicion, supported only by a local watchman's information, and that no injury was caused to any police officer. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges and the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent. The court examined the prima facie evidence and found the allegations against the petitioner to be based on suspicion without concrete proof. Consequently, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail when the case against him is based solely on suspicion and lack of overt act.
  • Whether the allegations constitute a prima facie case sufficient to deny bail.
  • Whether the conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS are satisfied for granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal law
  • assault
  • criminal force
  • suspicion
  • Section 482
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33814 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-493 Year-2025 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Sachin Paswan @ Sachin Kumar Paswan S/O Udho Paswan R/O village
                 -Piparpanti Kewata, Ward no-11, P.S- Dalsinghsarai, Dist- Samastipur.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar.
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   14-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

                   on behalf of the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest

                   in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 493 of 2025

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   126(2), 115(2), 121(1), 121(2), 118(1), 132, 352, 351(2),

                   351(3), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

                                3. As per FIR, petitioner alleged to assault and also

                   to use criminal force to deter informant who is a public

                   servant from discharging of his duty when he arrived to

                   village of petitioner to arrest the accused persons of

                   Dalsinghsarai P.S. Case No. 366 of 2025.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33814 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

          behalf of the petitioner that no overt act appears attributed

          to this petitioner and he was implicated only for the reason

          that he is co-villager of accused for search of whom police

          came to village. It is pointed out that implication of

          petitioner appears only on the basis of suspicion as his name

          was supplied by local chaukidar. While concluding the

          argument, it is further submitted that no injury was caused

          to any of the public servant/police personnel during the

          occurrence, which negate the allegation of assaulting and

          also of using criminal force to constitute the alleged offence.

                       5. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is pointed out

          that petitioner found involved in one more criminal case,

          where he is on bail.

                       6. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as petitioner appears implicated prima

          facie on the basis of suspicion, accordingly, above named

          petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

          learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of this
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33814 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
                                                          3/3




                        order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond

                        of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

                        the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                        Additional       Chief     Judicial      Magistrate-1st,   Dalsingsarai,

                        District- Samastipur/concerned Court, where the case is

                        pending in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No. 493

                        of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                        482(2) of the BNSS.



                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.