Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Hasmuddin @ Md. Hasmuddin @ Md. HasmudinversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Hasmuddin, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 93.9 litres of Nepali liquor. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no incriminating material was found in his possession, and that he had no involvement in the liquor seizure. The State opposed his bail application. Considering the facts, the period of custody since 07‑02‑2026, and the lack of direct evidence against him, the Court inclined to grant bail. The Court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount. The order was made on a prima facie basis and does not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in the absence of incriminating material in his possession.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • criminal procedure
  • presumption of innocence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33819 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-520 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Hasmuddin @ Md. Hasmuddin @ Md. Hasmudin S/o Nasuriddin @ Md.
                 Nasuriddin R/o vill - Shikarganj, ward no. 7, P.S.- Shikarganj, Distt.- East
                 Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sunil Kumar No.Iii, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Renuka Ratnakar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   24-06-2026              Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP

                   for the State.

                           2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dhaka PS

                   Case No. 520 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section/s

                   30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                           3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 93.9 liters of

                   Nepali liquor was recovered.

                           4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

                   no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is

                   in custody since 07.02.2026 and has got eight criminal
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33819 of 2026(3) dt.24-06-2026
                                                       2/2




                     antecedents.

                             5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                             6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

                     the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner,

                     this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                             7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail

                     bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the

                     like amount each to the satisfaction of concerned Court in

                     connection with Dhaka PS Case No. 520 of 2024.

                             8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                     prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                     adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                     shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                     and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                     manner.



                                                      (Ansul, J)
Siddharth Soni/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.