Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond and conditions, finding no sufficient basis to deny bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Kamlesh Kumar, was arrested in a case registered under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for allegedly discarding large quantities of intoxicant syrups containing codeine and nitrazepam. The prosecution claimed the contraband was recovered, but the petitioner argued that the items were found in an open bamboo clamp and not in his possession, contending a violation of Sections 42 and 45 of the NDPS Act. The State opposed bail, citing a prior similar offence, though the petitioner was already on bail for that case. The court noted that a co‑accused, Kaushal Prasad Gupta, had been granted bail by a coordinate bench and, considering the circumstances, ordered the petitioner’s bail to be enlarged upon furnishing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties. Conditions imposed included a relative as one bailor and a prohibition on committing similar offences until trial concludes.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act given the alleged recovery of contraband from an open place.
  • Whether the alleged violation of Sections 42 and 45 of the NDPS Act precludes grant of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent affects the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Section 21(c)
  • codeine
  • nitrazepam
  • contraband recovery
  • open place
  • prior criminal antecedent
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33821 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2026 Thana- BELA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Kamlesh Kumar S/O Late Badri Prasad Gupta R/O Vill.- Macchpakoni, P.S-
                 Bela, Dist – Sitamarhi.                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar.                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ayush Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-06-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State through virtual mode.

                                    2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

                   the offence punishable under Section 21 (c) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                    3. As per the prosecution case, huge quantity of

                   intoxicant syrups and medicines containing Codeine and

                   Nitrazepam etc like contraband are said to have been recovered,

                   which were allegedly thrown by the petitioner and others.

                                    4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the

                   petitioner that no recovery has been made from the conscious

                   or physical possession of the petitioner, rather the same was

                   recovered from a bamboo clamp which is an open place and

                   easily accessible to anyone, hence no liability can be fastened

                   on the petitioner. It is further submitted that there is violation of

                   Section 42 and 45 of the N.D.P.S. Act. It is pointed out that one

                   similarly situated co-accused, Kaushal Prasad Gupta has already

                   been granted the privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33821 of 2026(3) dt.11-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      Court vide order dated 21.05.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.35425

                      of 2026. The petitioner has been languishing in custody since

                      22.03.2026.

                                      5. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail

                      petition on the ground that the petitioner has one criminal

                      antecedent of similar nature of the offence. In response, it is

                      submitted that petitioner is on bail in the said case.

                                      6. Taking into consideration the facts and

                      circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the

                      similarly situated co-accused has already been granted the

                      privilege of bail, the above named petitioner is directed to be

                      enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

                      Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is

                      pending/successor Court in connection with Bela P.S. Case

                      No.80 of 2026, subject to the conditions that :

                                   (i) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative,

                      preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

                                   (ii)   The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any

                      similar offence till conclusion of the trial.


                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)

Trivedi/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.