Patna High Court
Kamlesh ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and conditions.
Summary
Kamlesh Chaudhari applied for anticipatory bail after the police, acting on an informant’s tip, seized 20 litres of country‑made Mahua wine and arrested Dharmendra Choudhary, who, in his confessional statement, named Chaudhari as an accomplice. The prosecution alleged an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. Chaudhari contended that he was not present at the site, no material was recovered from him, and he has a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the alleged contravention. The High Court, after reviewing the record, found no direct evidence linking Chaudhari to the seized wine and noted his absence at the occurrence, thereby granting anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and verification of his criminal antecedent under Section 482(2) of the CrPC.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner when the only allegation against him is a co‑accused’s confession and no material was recovered from his possession.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 — s. 30(a)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- prohibition law
- Mahua wine
- co‑accused confession
- clean antecedent
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34036 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-913 Year-2021 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Kamlesh Chaudhari Son of Ramnath Chaudhary Resident of Village-
Koshihan, P.S.- Chandi, District- Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 18-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Ara Nagar P.S. Case No.913 of 2021, for allegedly having
committed offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
3. As per the prosecution story, which has been lodged
on the basis of the statement made by the informant, to the
effect that on 25.12.2021, while he was on evening patrolling
duty with the police personnel, at around 18:45 hours, he got a
secret information that three persons have kept country made
Mahua wine near Meerachak Mahavir Mandir in a plastic
container. After giving information to the senior police officials,
the informant reached the place of occurrence and upon seeing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34036 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
2/4
the police party, three persons tried to flee away from there after
leaving the plastic container. On chase, one person was
apprehended, while two persons succeeded in fleeing away,
taking advantage of the darkness. The arrested person disclosed
his name as Dharmendra Choudhary and further disclosed the
name of the petitioner and one Hilam Choudhary. On search, 20
litres of country made Mahua wine was recovered for which
seizure list was prepared.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of the
confessional statement made by the co-accused before the police
and apart from the same, nothing has been alleged against the
petitioner. Since the petitioner was not present at the place of
occurrence, nothing has been recovered from his possession. It
is also submitted that the petitioner has got no concern with the
alleged seized wine and the seizure has been done from an open
place, which is accessible by any person. The petitioner is
working in Delhi to earn his livelihood and in the Holi festival,
he was at his native place, then he came to know about the
present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has got a
clean antecedent.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34036 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
3/4
for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties
and after going through the records, it appears that the petitioner
was not present at the place of occurrence. 20 litres of country
made Mahua wine was seized and one Dharmendra Choudhary
was arrested from the place of occurrence and on his disclosure,
the name of the petitioner has come. Since the petitioner was not
present at the place of occurrence, there is no question of any
recovery from him and he has also got a clean antecedent.
7. Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let the
petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender
within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1st, Bhojpur at Ara in
connection with Ara Nagar P.S. Case No.913 of 2021, subject to
the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
with a further condition that:-
The learned court concerned shall verify the criminal
antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found
that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the
court concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34036 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
4/4
the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of
the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of
or in the name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J.)
Sanjay/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.