Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raju Sahni @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Raju Sahni, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 70 litres of country-made liquor from an open pond area and charged under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no incriminating article in his possession, and had no prior criminal record, having been in custody since 24 March 2026. The State opposed his bail application. The Court considered that the liquor was recovered from an open place accessible to all and that no direct evidence linked the petitioner to the contraband. Consequently, the Court allowed the bail application, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, while noting that its observations were prima facie and not determinative of the trial's merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act when the alleged contraband was recovered from an open place and no incriminating article was found on the accused.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • prohibition
  • section 30(a)
  • liquor seizure
  • prima facie observation
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34038 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2026 Thana- KAMTAUL District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Raju Sahni @ Raju Kumar S/o Devan Sahni Resident of Village- Tataila, P.S.-
                 Kamtaul, Dist- Darbhanga, Bihar

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Saurav Anand, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nityanand, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in Kamtaul P.S. Case No.

                   19 of 2026 registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. There is recovery of 70 litres of country made

                   liquor near a pond inside the orchard.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely being implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of this petitioner. The alleged recovery

                   is made from an open place which is accessible to one and all.

                   Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since

                   24.03.2026.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34038 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

                      has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

                      and the fact that recovery is made from an open place, this bail

                      application is allowed.

                                   7. Accordingly, let the petitioner above named be

                      released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

                      Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of learned Incharge Special Judge-1 (Excise Act),

                      Darbhanga /concerned court below in connection with Kamtaul

                      P.S. Case No. 19 of 2026.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.


                                                                (Ansul, J)

Ranjeet/-Nitesh

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.