Patna High Court
Kanhai Chaudhary @ Kanhai ChaudhriversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and conditions, despite the confessional statement and his prior charges.
Summary
The petitioner, Kanhai Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with an excise case (Case No.48 of 2026) alleging a violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution’s case is based solely on a confessional statement made by another arrested individual, Vijay Choudhary, who was caught with 10 litres of illicit liquor and implicated the petitioner as a supplier. No liquor or any other incriminating material was recovered from the petitioner, and he was not present at the scene. The State opposed bail, arguing that the petitioner is a habitual offender, being charged in six similar cases, all of which are pending on bail. The Court examined the evidence, noted the lack of direct recovery from the petitioner, and considered the co‑accused’s allegation insufficient to deny bail. Consequently, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and verification of the petitioner’s criminal antecedents under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the only evidence against the petitioner is a confessional statement of a co‑accused.
- Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement in multiple pending cases precludes the grant of anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 — s. 30(a)
- B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- illicit liquor
- confessional statement
- habitual offender
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34042 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2026 Thana- Daudnagar Excise District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Kanhai Chaudhary @ Kanhai Chaudhri son of Late Rameshwar Chaudhary @
Rameshwar Chaudhri Resident of vill-Koilwan tola Raghunath bigha PS-
Haspura Dist- Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Adarsh Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Renu Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 18-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Daudnagar Excise P.S. Case No.48 of 2026, for allegedly
having committed offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
3. As per the prosecution story, which has been lodged
on the basis of the written information submitted by the informant,
to the effect that on 30.01.2026, at about 10:00 a.m., while the
informant along with police party on patrolling duty, at around
12:30 p.m., he saw a person coming and carrying bag in his hand.
Upon seeing the police, he tried to flee away, but was caught by
the police party. He disclosed his name as Vijay Choudhary and on
search of his bag, total 10 litres of illicit Chulai liquor was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34042 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
2/3
recovered. On the basis of the confessional statement made by the
arrested person, the name of the petitioner transpired in the case.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has not committed the present offence.
Nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The
petitioner was not present at the spot and his name has transpired
only on the basis of the confessional statement made before the
police by the arrested person, from whom 10 litres of illicit liquor
was recovered. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged
seized illicit liquor. He further submits that the petitioner has been
made accused in six other cases of similar nature and in all the
cases, he is on bail.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is
a habitual offender, who is accused in six other cases of similar
nature, therefore he does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory
bail.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and
after going through the records, it appears that the name of the
petitioner has transpired on the confessional statement made by the
arrested person, namely, Vijay Choudhary, who was caught by the
police with 10 litres of illicit liquor. Since, the petitioner was not
present at the place of occurrence, there is no question of any
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34042 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
3/3
recovery from him. The allegation of the co-accused is that the
petitioner used to sell the said liquor and he had purchased the
liquor from the petitioner.
7. Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let the
petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender
within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special
Judge Excise Court No.-II, Aurangabad, Bihar in connection with
Daudnagar Excise P.S. Case No.48 of 2026, subject to the
conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with a
further condition that:-
The learned court concerned shall verify the criminal
antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that
the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court
concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the
petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the
above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in
the name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J.)
Sanjay/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.