Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Atul Kumar TiwariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner, being merely a member of the mob with no specific act attributed to him and no prior criminal antecedent, is entitled to regular bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Atul Kumar Tiwari, was arrested in connection with a mob assault that resulted in the death of Amit Dubey, alleged to have been carried out with lathis, dandas and knives. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was part of the mob, while the co-accused Ankit Pathak was specifically identified as the one who inflicted the fatal stab wound. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that he had no specific role, no prior criminal record, and that the lethal act was solely attributable to the co-accused. The State opposed the grant of regular bail. The High Court, after considering the facts and the lack of direct involvement, ordered the petitioner to be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to an accused under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS in a murder‑related assault case.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged participation as a member of the mob, without a specific act of stabbing, warrants denial of bail.

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • sections 103(1) BNS
  • section 3(5) BNS
  • mob assault
  • murder
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3415 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2025 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Atul Kumar Tiwari, S/O Harendra Tiwari, R/O Vill- Chanchaliya, P.O-
                 Rajdhani, P.S- Taraiya, Dist- Saran at Chapra- 841424.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 103(1) and

                   3 (5) of the BNS.

                                3.    The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner

                   along with other accused persons allegedly arrived at the place

                   of occurrence armed with ‘lathi’, ‘danda’ and ‘knife’                           and

                   started assaulting the son of the informant, namely, Amit Dubey.

                   It is further alleged that when the inmates of the informant’s

                   house raised alarm and attempted to rescue him, the co-accused,

                   namely, Ankit Pathak inflicted a ‘knife’ blow on the chest of the

                   informant’s son indiscriminately.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3415 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       connection with the present case. It is further submitted that

                       from the perusal of the order passed by the learned trial Court, it

                       is clear that as per the post-mortem report, the cause of death is

                       hemorrhage and shock due to stab injury. It is further submitted

                       that the specific and overt act of stabbing has been attributed to

                       co-accused, namely, Ankit Pathak and that the petitioner is

                       merely a member of the mob without any specific role being

                       assigned to him. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in

                       judicial    custody       since    10.08.2025       having   no   criminal

                       antecedent.

                                    5.     Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                                    6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                       of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on

                       bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on

                       bail in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025 on

                       furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                       sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                       Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-13, Saran at Chapra.


                                                         (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.