Patna High Court
Bakhera SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.
Summary
Bakhera Singh was arrested on 15 December 2025 in connection with a murder conspiracy alleged in FIR dated 10 April 2025, charging him under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that the FIR contains no specific allegation of assault, overt act, or firing against him, unlike co‑accused who have already been granted anticipatory or regular bail. The State opposed bail, citing four prior criminal antecedents, but acknowledged the petitioner is already on bail in other pending matters. The Court observed the absence of a direct charge against the petitioner and the precedent of bail to similarly situated co‑accused, and therefore ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, and non‑tampering with evidence. The bail order also directed the lower court to verify the petitioner’s criminal antecedents and cancel bail if concealment is discovered.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite prior criminal antecedents and the nature of the alleged offences.
- Whether the lack of a specific allegation of assault or overt act against the petitioner warrants bail.
- Whether the bail granted to co‑accused in similar circumstances is determinative for the petitioner’s bail application.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27
- Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 — s. 103(1), 61(2)
Subjects
- bail
- anticipatory bail
- criminal procedure
- conspiracy to murder
- arms act
- prior criminal antecedents
- Indian criminal law
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34172 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria
======================================================
Bakhera Singh Son of Bhattu Singh @ Bhatu Singh Resident of Village-
Nawada, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 08-07-2026 Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel
for the petitioner as well as Mr. Choubey Jawahar, learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since
15.12.2025 in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No.90 of
2025, F.I.R. dated 10.04.2025 for the offences punishable under
Sections 103(1), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and
Section 27 of Arms Act.
3. According to prosecution case, it is alleged that the
petitioner along with other accused persons in conspiracy killed
the husband of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the
present case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34172 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026
2/4
false and fabricated. From bare perusal of the FIR it appears that
specific allegation of assault is attributed against co-accused
persons, namely, Ashish Kumar, Sonu Kumar and Ritesh Kumar
and there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act or firing
against this petitioner. He further submits that similarly situated
co-accused person, namely, Diwakar Singh has been granted the
privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated
31.07.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 47881 of 2025 and other co-
accused persons, namely, Rajiya Devi @ Raj Kumari Devi,
Bijal Singh, Uday Singh @ Uday Kumar have been granted the
privilege of bail by different co-ordinate Benches of this Court
vide order dated 30.07.2025, 18.11.2025, 18.11.2025 in Cr.
Misc. No. 45294 of 2025, Cr. Misc. No.74222 of 2025, Cr.
Misc. No. 74924 of 2025. He further submits that the police
after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the
petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the
State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the
petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries four criminal
antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits on the
basis of paragraph-3 of the bail application that the petitioner is
on bail in the pending matters.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34172 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026
3/4
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act or firing
against this petitioner and similarly situated co-accused persons,
have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail and regular
bail by this Court or by different co-ordinate Benches of this
Court, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with
Chautham P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025, subject to the following
conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34172 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026
4/4
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.