Patna High Court
Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Dharmendra Rai, was implicated in an excise case (Case No. 70 of 2026) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, for allegedly storing 938.130 litres of illicit foreign liquor in a secret underground chamber of a semi‑constructed house that is part of a joint family property. The liquor was discovered during a police raid; the petitioner was not present at the site. He sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, lack of possession, and that the charge is based merely on his prior criminal record, which includes two similar cases. The State opposed bail, citing his multiple pending cases and prior similar offences. After considering the facts, the High Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, verification of his antecedents, and a condition that one surety be a close relative, with the power to cancel bail if concealment is discovered. The order was made under Section 482(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the recovery of a large quantity of illicit liquor and his prior criminal antecedents.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- illicit foreign liquor
- joint family property
- criminal antecedent
- Section 30
- Section 482
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34178 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2026 Thana- EXCISE PATORI District- Samastipur
======================================================
Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar Rai S/o Rambabu Rai Resident of
Ward No. 08 (earlier ward no. 11), Vikrampur, Sarangpur, P.S.- Halai,
District- Samastipur, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Keshav Bhardwaj
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ahmad Ali
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 18-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Patory Excise
Case No. 70 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar
Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. As per the prosecution story which has been lodged on
the basis of written report submitted by the informant to the
effect that he received a secret information that in huge quantity,
illicit foreign liquor has been concealed in a secret underground
chamber constructed inside a semi-constructed brick house
under the possession of the petitioner. The informant after
informing the superior authority, constituted a raiding team
consisting of police officials and armed guards and at around
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34178 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
2/4
9:50 P.M. reached at the place of occurrence. He found some
empty liquor cartons lying near the semi-constructed house and
upon digging the soil, a secret underground chamber was
allegedly detected. On inspection thereof, several cartons
containing foreign liquor were allegedly found stored therein.
Total 938.130 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from
the semi-constructed house. The petitioner was not found at the
place of occurrence.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.
Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious
possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has got no
concern with the alleged illicit foreign liquor. He further submits
that the house which is a semi-constructed, is a joint family
property and has not yet been partitioned in between the family
members. He further submits that the petitioner has been made
an accused in the present case only on the basis of having 4
criminal antecedent, out of which, two cases are of similar
nature.
4. The Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner
is an accused in four other cases and out of which, two are of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34178 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
3/4
similar nature and he does not deserve the privilege of
anticipatory bail.
5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and
after going through the records, it appears that total 938.130
litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the semi-
constructed house which is joint family property of the
petitioner. The petitioner was not present at the place of
occurrence. He has got four cases, out of which, two are of
similar nature.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender
before the learned court below within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail
bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special
Judge, Excise-II, Samastipur in connection with Patory Excise
Case No. 70 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., with further condition:
(i) The learned Court concerned shall verify the
criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it
is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
antecedents, the Court concerned shall take steps for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34178 of 2026(2) dt.18-05-2026
4/4
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(ii) One of the bailors should be close relative of the
petitioner.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
A.K.V.//-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.